I meant the precision that OP already has knowledge in the domain and asks for more in depth elements
I'm sorry but doesn't this go against this community's concept of providing simple explanations for things?
J'ai des amis très proche qui sont vers Montpellier, salaires de smicard, qui ne permet en aucun cas de vivre décemment avec leurs familles dans la ville. Donc obligation de banlieue, plutôt lointaine, et services de transports abyssaux (quand ils existent), donc voiture obligatoire, littéralement aucune autre solution n'existe pour eux, et c'est un grave problème, d'autant plus qu'ils sont loin d'être seuls dans ce genre de situation.
Yes of course, and I'm all for it, I just hope it's a first step and not the end
Very good start, but as a French I fear that it may not be complete until it starts to include the high speed lines (TGV) that are the most expensive but also the most competitive when trying to divert traffic from cars or planes
Le highlight de ma journée pénible c'est ouvrir lemmy sur la commu France pour voir un peu de chaleur humaine dans ces "bienvenus" distribués sans modération !
Not too much techy, paleontologist here
Yes, and as someone who is probably close to a 5yo's knowledge on the topic, I don't know anything (or close to that) on either programming or other parts of being "tech savvy". Thus me saying that coming on the ELI5 community and saying "yeah I actually want a very much not 5yo answer type" is not the spirit, I'd much rather like first basic answers, and eventually other comments going more in-depth, like we see in the majority of posts here