Tartas1995

To be fair, depends on what your perspective is. A person in/after the french revolution, might didn't have the best time, I mean... In the revolution, a lot of people died and afterwards we talk about a time called the reign of terror for a reason. But as a completely detached spectator, and the power of hindsight, you might think that the little man won against the rich.

So from a completely detached perspective with no real threat to anything which is meaningful to oneself, one might conclude that the little man has won in the past and would win again. It ain't your price to pay, you know.

To me, it sounds like you are expressing that you think that the "regular" Palestinians are supportive of Hamas.

Have you considered that they tell her to shut up because they don't want her to make herself the target of Hamas?

I think even the most clueless non American can figure out that someone deciding that they don't want to do a public office before the election of that public office is hardly undemocratic and while I am not clueless, I am a non American and live with non Americans. I think I can guessimate that.

I worked in a office supplier at one point. People would enter the office, put some documents on the first desk they see and look at the guy sitting there. No hello... No sentence... Nothing... That is usually the point when we knew what was up. The guy would look at the documents and say "you aren't at the right place. Wrong floor. Wrong door. " They would look at us in shock. Sometimes complain that you couldn't tell where you are. It was always the same. They wanted to get something from the government. They had an office in the same building. There were multiple big sign. There was literally 2 signs outside telling you which floor. Obviously our office had a sign too. They passed at least 3 signs in an office building while they were looking where to go... People don't read signs.... They just don't.

I could be wrong but I think it runs on boot. So it would loop into bsod.

I don't want to argue with you and I admit that my phrasing wasn't ideal but I assumed that it was obvious that i was talking about everything that would be executed on the machine. Apparently it wasn't.

Well do you want to have Microsoft approving EVERY driver for windows? Rip 3rd party open source drivers for retro hardware

There are people called Sam and not Samantha. There are Matts that aren't Matthews. There are Joes that aren't Joseph.

Maybe don't be a Richard?

Basically, crowdstrike wrote bad code that run as a driver, windows doesn't like bad code in their drivers. Kernel level code is generally expected to run properly. crowdstrike's kernel level code was really bad. Embarrassingly bad.

If the host creates a playlist and everyone can add their favorite song to the playlist, the host won't be blamed if you add "erika". People rightfully think you are an ignorant weirdo or a bad person, not the host.

I don't think it is relevant.

The xkcd points out distribution and population.

The second map highlights how much more democratic the us is than republican and that is it obviously a broken system that republican's have a chance of winning

To be fair there is more than 1 definition.

I think it is fairly obvious that the "inventor" of the paradox of tolerance didn't use the term with the meaning that it is self-contradicting and therefore wrong but rather the alternative definition of "a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true". And the peace treaty/social contract solution is assuming that you can't be tolerant to the intolerant, so they agree on "yet is perhaps true" part. And the first section is obviously true.

The paradox is about being "obliged" to be intolerant to protect (and maximize) the tolerance.

If you don't actively act against intolerance, you allow the intolerance to exist, allowing intolerance will result in more intolerance.