[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

I love borzois but lol

[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago

If it is an official act, which would mean they would have to assassinate you in their function of being the president. In other words, they couldn't just kill their neighbors.

They could probably kill them as part of a celebration, I guess. Jk, I hope.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

"Help starving children!"

"But you wouldn't want to be there! Gotten!!!"

Coherent. Very coherent.

[-] [email protected] 59 points 2 months ago

Imagine you live in a world where major voices of a political party is clearly expressing that their current guy will run down the world and thinks that it is a w, because the other guy is worse.

Thanks Dems, you fail the USA and the world at large! Literally ruining the only accessable livable planet. But w for not being trump!

[-] [email protected] 78 points 3 months ago

Temu is also shady about your data. So lol, you fucked yourself too.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago

Der alte Mann ist unglücklich weil jemand ihn darauf hinweisen hat, dass wenn er Leute die das Bürgergeld beziehen nicht in Misskredit bringen will, sollte er sich nicht so auf die eigenen wenigen "Komplettverweigern" fokussieren in seiner Reden über das Bürgergeld. Zumal wenn es so ein kleiner Prozentsatz ist.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago

The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically "make it do 1 thing and that very well", systemd goes against that idea.

You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can't run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago

That is surprisingly accurate

[-] [email protected] 134 points 5 months ago

He thinks saying, I am cisgendered, is hate speech.

He literally wrote other- isms ... Criticism, I guess. He is an idiot.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago

I am only a Linux user. I don't feel trans, nor am I a furry. Could you become a furry for me to average me out? Thanks!

[-] [email protected] 79 points 8 months ago

With anons social and communication skills, I am not sure if pedo or trying to express that being 14 is the best time of your life.

189
this really happened. (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey, I can tell you want it does. While I don't know if they try to download something too (while it really doesn't look like it), they are trying to steal your browser cookies.

I haven't removed the obfuscation yet as I am literally in bed but I can tell the general idea of the code.

Onload is a html attribute. Html attribute tell your browser more about what the browser should be doing. So basically onload is an instruction to your browser. By posting those comments, they try to run something called cross site scripting. Basically they want to run their code in your browser without them being the website owner. So now we know the intend of the post, let's look into the details.

Onload is an attribute that tells the browser to do something once it is fully loaded.

Fetch is a function that allows your browser to request additional information from the server. Endless scrolling would be done with that.

String.fromcharcode is just there to hide a little bit. Think of it as a fancy way to say a word. they are saying a website to connect to there.

Then document.cookie are your cookies for that website.

The next thing is probably your username or something.

So what does that mean? They try to make your browser execute their code when the website is onloaded. The code sends your cookies and your username(?) To a server. They probably save the username and cookie and try to steal the account later.

You seeing the code is good evidence that your browser hasn't execute the code as the browser didn't understand it as code to be executed but code to display. So you are probably safe and don't need to worry

Edit: ups sorry for not answering the question. I don't know which client they are targeting. They might or might not be targeting wefwef. But they target you, the user, too. And it is probably for Webbrowser users, so chances are wefwef or other web clients.

Edit edit: some people pointed out that it is not the username but basically the admin status of the account.

view more: next ›

Tartas1995

joined 1 year ago