1meal/hour

You can’t make someone interested in learning. You can investigate what excites someone and foster that excitement. You can also show your excitement and hope it’s contagious. But, sometime it’s not.

I could comment on how I feel about this new AI, but I prefer not to

Pathetic. Given the seriousness of what he said, and continues to say even this month, no one with a working brain could possibly believe anything in this sad non-attempt at an apology message. It doesn’t resolve anything, it doesn’t make clear that he understands what was wrong with what he said, it doesn’t specify what he is going to do differently going forward, and it isn’t even clear that it is truly a message from him or genuine.

It doesn’t prevent the rape, but they do have “cul-de-sac pouches en route, that could prevent fertilisation by capturing unwelcome sperm.” So they can choose whether or not they get fertilized. Which is at least some sort of a defense. Edit: link for quote

When people would do something then say “psych”

Nice video. Yes caterpillars have a proto-wing internally before they pupate. But, as they say in the video, it’s a myth that they turn into goo in the cocoon. They don’t.

Don’t care what it’s called. I think what most people just want to know are:

• How effective is it?
• How safe is it?
• What is the risk without taking it?

Maybe skip the semantics

Might as well add this to the pile of lies.

I’m just going to leave this here. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/he-lied-ohio-voters-struggle-after-trump-promised-jobs

The drugs selected to undergo negotiations are:

• Eliquis, a blood thinner
• Xarelto, a blood thinner
• Januvia, a diabetes drug
• Jardiance, a diabetes drug
• Enbrel, a rheumatoid arthritis drug
• Imbruvica, a drug for blood cancers
• Farxiga, a drug for diabetes, heart failure and chronic kidney disease
• Entresto, a heart failure drug
• Stelara, a drug for psoriasis and Crohn's disease
• Fiasp and NovoLog, for diabetes

(via NBC)

Not much more satisfying than climbing a fence as a kid and then finding out that’s the reason they built the fence higher.

It seems to me that increasing supply alone is not going to cut it. Are there not a bunch of financial groups with nearly bottomless wallets that enable them to afford to buy up any amount of property to rent or flip at any price they want, even if it means some properties sit on the market empty for a long time? This government policy seems analogous to having people with $100 dollars sitting at a no-limit poker table with a bunch of billionaires who can afford to endlessly put you all in on every bet, so they always bet more than you have and then the government comes in and says they will allow for more games to be played. Wouldn’t the policy be pointless if you don’t also limit the number of games the wealthy players can play?