Supernova1051

joined 2 years ago
[–] Supernova1051 1 points 11 hours ago

Last I checked Threema was at least just as good as Signal. Unfortunately Threema is a paid app, which makes it really difficult to for me to recommend as there are many opposed to paying for apps for various reasons. I stick with Signal and even being free (I do donate monthly) I've struggled to get people to switch. I find Signals approach of being donation funded to be more equitable and accessible.

[–] Supernova1051 10 points 23 hours ago

loops is still very early in development. people need to tamper their expectations.

[–] Supernova1051 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm interested in running one. any services you can link to that are that cheap?

[–] Supernova1051 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

In addition, it's estimated to current cost about $500 a month just to store the contents of a relay server. this doesn't include network or computer cost. this will only get more expensive and lead to big businesses being the only players. relays, being the "Post office" of bluesky, have the power to suppress whatever they don't like.

ActivityPub really is "for the people".

[–] Supernova1051 56 points 1 day ago (5 children)

what the fuck, NPR?

[–] Supernova1051 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

deals with Microsoft or any other competitor who may want to silence alternatives.

[–] Supernova1051 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

XMPP only does message encryption. Signal has spent tons of engineering time and effort to minimize the collection of metadata, not just encryption of message content.

[–] Supernova1051 2 points 3 days ago

Privacy and security is all about threat modeling. Signal meets 100% of the security needs of everyone I communicate with in my region of the world. There's no need (especially now that you can hide phone numbers) for the added security benefits of SimpleX.

Additionally, my experience in using SimpleX over the last year+ is that message delivery is not reliable yet. This has forced me and the few people I've been testing it with to fall back to Signal multiple times. Because of these reliability issues and lacking UX, I don't feel comfortable pushing it on others, knowing the tolerance level is low for message delivery failures and UX that isn't yet up to par with other messaging apps.

[–] Supernova1051 2 points 3 days ago

You're right! not sure why I thought SimpleX was a fork, it's definitely just using the Signal protocol. Thanks for the clarification. That said, I would objectively state the UX needs some work to get to where Signal is at. SimpleX is oddly both easy to use but confusing and unreliable. I've been using it for a little over a year now and very often messages just stop getting delivered or received, forcing a fall back to Signal.

SimpleX is still very promising and more secure than Signal if your threat model necessitates it, but I continue to champion Signal for its ease of use, reliability, and security compared to more mainstream messengers.

[–] Supernova1051 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

keep spreading FUD, my guy 😎

[–] Supernova1051 29 points 5 days ago (20 children)

The day security researchers say Signal is bad is the day I'll stop using it. Until then, it's the best option we have that both provides both great privacy and UX. The only thing that comes close - and it still has a ways to go - is SimpleX, but it's basically a signal fork and it's devs still support Signal.

[–] Supernova1051 41 points 1 week ago

nearly daily Apex player moving to Linux full time again now that many more games work with it (knowing Apex no longer works). It will suck, but fuck microsoft and good riddance EA.

view more: next ›