SnooPandas2964

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Office work? Yes. Gaming? eh..... Perhaps some older games, or newer games at ungodly low resolutions. If gaming is important to you, you really want a dedicated gpu.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Nice. That should be fast enough for most tasks. That gpu ( assuming its the non xt) might struggle at 4k depending on the game, if that matters to you. Good news is GPUs are easy to upgrade if you ever feel you want more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm going to say the same thing I always do, and thats the artic II 240, because its cheap and I have one and it seems to be able to handle just about anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Apple is more efficient, but still not more powerful than intels higher end skus.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is one white by chance?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I wish I had an answer for you. I tend to cheap out on motherboards, I bought the B760 Gigabyte Aorus Elite Ax DDR5 (I know I know, but I had just bought a 4090 and was feeling the pinch.)

And its really been not bad. There's 3 m.2 slots which is not bad, 4 sata ports which is better than none I suppose. Memory overclocking works well. My 5600 cl36 kit is running at 6400 cl30 stable, which is a way bigger overclock than I was ever able to get stable on ddr4. I'm undervolting too, luckily my MB offered a feature to bypass the undervolt protection on b760 boards.

Doesn't seem like there's much performance penalty either. On cinebench 2024 my single thread score is actually slightly above expected ( 132 vs 131) and my multicore is also slightly above expected (2093 vs 2021) but it was a bit lower before the undervolt.

So really the only thing I can't do is overclock the core. Oh well, 5.5ghz all pcore is good enough I say! This board I think was $225 cad or ~$160 US. So overall I'd say I'm satisfied. But next time I might go for a Z board, we'll see.

Anyway sorry for the rant, I'm not saying buy a b760 board, just saying sometimes cheap boards aren't as bad as they might appear, even if they are from a company that has some.... image problems.

So I'd say, buy for the features you want. I mean if you want something that looks fancy looking there's nothing wrong with that. But no point buying something just because its expensive. Oh, and if you want to get some of the fastest ddr5 around, it might best to get a board with 2 slots, instead of 4.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I would personally wouldn't go over 3600. You could even just stick with 3200, its still fast, and really cheap right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

My 13600k idle power usage was very low. Like less than 10w sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Desktops aren't getting meteor lake. We have to wait until Arrow lake.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Does it crash with xmp off? if no, then you might have to play around with your voltages and timings to get your memory stable first. Its... kind of common with ddr5. Also, keep an eye on temperatures.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Well i3s and i5s have been around for nearly 15 years now so, that doesn't tell us much. But intel's processors are usually quite good at idle power draw, so generally, a higher tier cpu is going to give you more power for when you need it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

But the 14700k is just as fast in gaming and way cheaper...

 

As the title says, I'm considering upgrading my 13600k to a 14700k ( yes I know it wont be a huge upgrade, no need to remind me). My liquid freezer II 240 has cooled my 13600k exceptionally well. It rarely goes above 50c in gaming. All pcores boost to 5.1ghz no sweat. Perhaps that thick radiator helps idk.

I'm hoping I'll have undervolting avaliable for this but I'm not 100% sure it will work. So I think I should go into this assuming undervolting wont work and if it does, even better. Explaining will take too many words and I'm trying to keep this short.

Anyway, what I want from this cpu is the cache, the two extra p-cores especially for apps that don't use ecores, and the higher turbo frequencies, primarily for poorly multithreaded games ( cant overclock on this mobo). Will I be able to sustain 5.5ghz all p-core in gaming/emulation loads? I suspect I wont be able to in cinebench but I don't really care about that. Even the 13600k gets into the 90s in cinebench r23 but it doesn't throttle.

Also, would disabling some of the ecores perhaps help as a last resort? I know they're helpful for background tasks and even helpful for gaming sometimes, but do I really need 12 for that?

Oh, and I have a 4090 btw. And for airflow I have 2 140mm, and 1 120mm fans for intake, and the aio plus one more 120mm fan for exhaust.

Thanks!

view more: next ›