Hey man, fuck google, but this isn’t achieving diddly squat lmao.
Shiggles
joined 2 years ago
How often does a solution need “new” code and not “basically the same code as a previous issue but with two small details changed”? This is a genuine question, I have only ever coded as a hobby. But 25% of your work being essentially just copy pasted sounds plausible, and that’s sorta all LLMs are doing, right?
That’s a good idea! I’m gonna steal it when I return to ramp up Fulgoran production, perhaps with some circuitry, perhaps not. Personally I’m thinking of having all factories branch off of the main scrap line with filter splitters.
How’d that work out for Johansson?
“Simping” for someone you will never meet, at the expense of real world interaction, is not normal human behavior, it’s a form of toxic celebrity worship.
Other interpretations sure whatever but it started as a term to describe the former case.
Nope, melting ice. Remember that you can void basically anything by feeding it into a recycler facing another recycler that feed into each other. I would recommend buffering things like processing units before they hit the void though lol.
Be the change you want to see in the - wait no
Notably, the article means specifically non gaming software, something previous X3D chips tended to be worse at than their base versions.
Everyone else’s brain automatically play the bass boosted sound effect? Kill me, please.
Did you… read the article? He literally complains about the hyper commercialization and the difference in how a “fandom” of 15 year olds were all just mutually enjoy something versus how a fandom of 40 year old dudes were infinitely less pleasant.
Lemme know how that one turns out for ya bub