They're both terrible people. But I guess the internet likes the story because it's a rare case of "attractive woman pays the consequences"
We rarely see famous people, let alone famous women get punished for their terrible behavior.
But yeah, I'm sure all this attention does not help a person going through a difficult emotional experience
Archeology does not build infrastructure to make people's lives easier but neither does any form of entertainment like Cinema, Music, Theater, Museums and others.
Medicine law and engineering are wonderful jobs, and necessary to live. But Art, History, Philosophy and Music are things we live for
It's fine if you're not a fan of it, but it's quite childish to think certain things are of less value because you personally don't like it.
Can you consider moving to a better place? I understand you might have things going you down but it's good to evaluate your options
My guy, I'm glad you have the energy to defend your values, but as I said, you're holding on to a bad argument.
Your argument is an appeal for emotion. You're saying "we're killing millions of animals! Isn't that awful!?"
This argument doesn't work because of 2 things. Many people disagree that killing for meat is unnatural and many people do not align with the intensity of your emotions towards animal death.
Both of those points are highly dependent on personal opinion, that makes it really easy to discuss and disagree.
The arguments I presented before are facts and cannot be dismissed by personal opinion. You simply have to argue on what makes people accept these bad figures and why they should not
And to answer your question about lions and rape. The lions sexuality is not part of my human instinct or nature, so it does not concern me. On the other hand, eating bone marrow and hunting for meat is essential to the development of the Homo Sapiens and it does concern me as my body, like my ancestors, was made to eat meat.
I don't have to eat meat although it's healthy, and I would like to produce less CO2 although my health comes first. I don't know how to balance those 2 conflicts
I really want to help you here, so please give this topic a thought
I know you have good intentions, but I just want to point that animals getting killed is part of the natural cycle and it happens in the wilderness literally millions of times a day.
That's the worst argument towards veganism.
The two best arguments in my opinion are: the meat industry produces a ton of CO2, and we could feed more people with the same amount of land.
I'm not entirely in support of veganism since I think that some animal protein is essential for the average person's diet. But I certainly agree with the 2 reasons above.
Oh so you're autistic? Name all model trains then!
So your suggestion is that we ignore 34 guilty veredicts?
Well in a way the US will ignore it. A twice impeached 34 times guilty ex-president is still allowed to walk on the street and even run for president again.
Yeah, the penal system in the US and quite frankly it's whole constitution are a joke
I see. Haha. I was being an idiot
The Yard is the distance from the nose to the tip of the fingers from a random English king.
The meter is the distance from the equator to the North Pole divided by 10 000 000.
One is the creation of a fat monarch that knew nothing except of how to exploit the population. The other is a piece of identity from the earth itself. Created and agreed upon by a group of Scientists.
But you're right, how would an American know that
Oh yeah? I have a model train behind my back, what model is it?
What? Where's the fucking roof? It's totally unfinished. Are they stupid?
Oh, what did they name it?