Nay. You shouldn't be able to buy your way to influencing policy.
If there really is a concern with bot accounts or duplicate accounts, then those should be tackled via different ways. Also, what is with the assumption that "assholes" both don't have money and also shouldn't be allowed to vote?
There's /c/[email protected] . Their sidebar says "lemmy communities", but they may be fine with you posting kbin ones, since afaik federation works well.
Aye, but with the caveat that people outside the instance should be allowed/encouraged to make comments if they feel it has value.
Fun fact: If you google those codes you find out that they are "real" codes, but they don't actually activate Windows. I think they are something that are used as placeholders in the upgrade from Windows 8 to 10 or something, but don't know the specifics.
ChatGPT actually can't create new "words", just regurgitate words that it's seen somewhere before!
This happens to me as well! Wondering if it's some weird interaction specific to some android versions or something, given it's been happening for multiple versions for me.
I've been perpetually working on various gamedev projects for many years now. I'll finish one eventually, I promise!
Most recent one is a retro style JRPG. With a flexable skill system where each character has two classes and can pick some number of skills from them. Also has a number of equippable "quick time" events a-la Mario RPGs. Using ggez for it, which is a decent engine. Although for future projects I may pick something more feature complete like bevy.
Currently thinking about starting a new project to make a Sonic-like game, because if Sega isn't going to do it, I may as well give it a go. :P
Just a quick idea I had, and this may have been suggested before and maybe be untenable. But... Could communities be made invite/approval only as well as instances?
For example, on beehaw they want to ensure that everyone posting to their communities have been vetted in some way. So could have all the communities not allow posts by who haven't agreed to beehaw's "content policy"? Either by naturally having an account on beehaw, or by submitting a request to a moderator of the community.
Would allow people on other instances to see and follow those posts (but not post themselves, unless they go through beehaw's approval process), and beehaw people to go and interact with other communities on other instances.
At the bottom of each page, there's a link for "instances", which shows who the current instance has blocked.
I joined Beehaw early on when things where a lot quieter because I liked what they were trying to do (and back then there were only like two instances, and I didn't want to put more load on lemmy.ml).
Joined sh.itjust.works to make a community after the sysadmin just casually walked up with a huge server, which is a level of swagger I can get behind. I've since moved to this as my "main" account since Beehaw defederated with lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works (which sucks, but is understandable).
May move again to pawb.social at some point, although that means people will know something about me. :P
Edit: And now pawb.social has defederated with sh.itjust.works... I'm getting more and more tempted to just roll my own personal instance just for me...
You can actually see this here; beehaw recently blocked lemmy.world , so as far as Beehaw is aware, lemmy.world "doesn't exist".
As you can see, old posts remain on the instance (unless the admins go and remove them), but new posts don't get received. I think you might be able to post on Beehaw's mirror, but they won't get shared with any other instances.
Of course, this is all subject to change in some future Lemmy version, because this sort of thing can be confusing and counter intuitive.