The thing is if you want to maintain rule of law then you need to follow those rules. You can’t just decide to ignore it when you want to but then pretend you have any legitimacy. That would make you no different than any other dictator.
RowRowRowYourBot
joined 4 days ago
and that process requires the mayor to be presented charges that he gets to defend himself against. That’s a trial
You could kill almost anyone in NV as you cannot kill children in any game nor can you kill major quest givers.
Perhaps they have reasons to not want to encourage senseless violence to NPC’s at a time when a chunk of the population clearly views others as IRL NPC’s?
“to be heard in his defense” that’s from the actual law. Im using defense because that was the verb used, whereas you are using respond which means the same thing in this context.
Im not sure what the goal was here. It seems the complaint is that you cannot shoot NPCs in non-combat situations. That while one game considers taking items to be stealing whereas the other does not which the content creator seems to miss.
Is this really about attention to detail or do they just prefer one game to the other due to directorial choices?
They will be able to cite the extrajudicial removal of Adams as precedent for why they can do it.
Do you think rule of law should only be maintained when both of the two major parties supports it?
Do you think Hochul is going to win reelection? Do you think she will never be replaced? The precedent is for the NY governors that follow her. Wasn't that obvious?
There are actual expectations of what you should believe as dictated by the texts some of which are very clear. If you are against clothing the naked, feeding the hungry, or tending to the sick you are overtly working against the path Jesus sets in the NT.
Perhaps it is more accurate to say these people are falsely claiming their faith as the motivation for their bigotry.
Ok buddy, sure it isn't. What is it called when you face a negative outcome due to your potential wrongdoing? Oh yeah that's called a punishment.
Do you think the trial that never happened counts?
Do you need me to explain what a trial is?
Do they need to be public property or do they need to be in the hands of those working there? I’d be more inclined towards the latter as in most cases the public as a whole is not going to have an informed or educated perspective on how specific jobs/roles/companies should behave.