Pika

it still wouldn't pass the requirements, the patent is bullshit. It's any object tossed at a creature. Could be ninja stars or an old boot and it would violate the patent.

They also own the patent of riding a claimed char (in both the air and ground if I understand it right) so they are technically still in violation of Nintendo's patents. It's so dumb

Furthermore, they also own the patent of aiming a device and catching in a percentage chance.

reading web pages yes there was, I never personally had an issue with it though. Being said I am for the change, binging some of the older components to a newer easier to maintain codebase is a good thing in my eyes.

if patents were actually used properly it would be no issue. They were meant to prevent other companies from stealing your mechanic as you were still in development, however it's changed to be an abuse tactic to prevent others from entering the field.

and just like that, my temporary negative review just became permanent. Heavily against allowing bullying like this, especially broad patents like these. Nintendo doesn't own the tamed creature industry, despite what it thinks.

interesting, I wasn't aware it wasn't allowed sale.

ooo I get it now, was taking the comment too subjective instead of litteral

I mean concidering Tesla lost the EU market, it's likely this will go unchallenged. but yes shitty but expected from the company.

man even with this explanation I'm not dad enough to understand the joke

I used to track authors who post delete and block them when I notice a trend for this very reason in a diff community. It sucks putting in effort to make a reply and then having the entire chain get nuked from orbit.

I had a tech post that I put a bit of effort replying to get deleted after they had resolved the question, no reason for deletion just that they apperently don't like having posts connected to their account. so once their problem was solved they deleted the post. Discouraging.

honestly if I was op I wouldn't respond to that question regardless if AI was(or wasn't) used, the "did you use AI question" very easily falls into a slippery slope where others hop on and harrass people over it, so it's easier to just ignore the question.

The counter argument on this is, you need to be an authorized person on the account to enable and considering authorized people are the people who are paying the bill they have full control. In the eyes of the Telecom the authorized user owns every device that's on the account so they say they want to track it they're allowed to track.

If you're worried about privacy and someone tracking you that's part of your plan, you need to isolate into a separate plan. You lose so many areas of privacy by being on someone else's plan, like the saving money is nice but they can look up your call history, some carriers allow you to look up SMS history it's not good

very true