That is also an act of war. National militaries don't commit acts of terrorism. They commit crimes against humanity, war crimes, or the justification of war aka causus belli.
Peaty
joined 1 year ago
Unfortunately I already have been assaulted
That's probably the safer approach
Read the link as it does in fact discuss this. I did supply evidence you just haven't read it.
And the flared base is not the side that goes in your ass
It's in the link I supplied. They talk about how it went from twenty nine years old to seventy from 1930 to now. You want to guess what the biggest change was for Inuit in that time?
The fact that the brain needs glucose means your brain does need carbs. You might not need to eat carbs to get that glucose but that's different.
The fact is we have no idea how healthy or unhealthy a keto diet is long term for people with "normal" digestion.
I bought mine for $20 before they discontinued it and resold it unused for $250 on Ebay
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm
Source on premodern Inuits living substantially shorter lifespans
Obviously I can't source a negative that there aren't dietary studies on people with "normal" digestion doing keto for decades. You can try finding them and discovering no e have been done on your own.
No I didn't miss it. These words mean things already. Terrorism is something non-state entities engage in. When nations do it they are called acts of war.
If a bunch of American burn down a bar in Canada that would be terrorism. If the US army did the same thing it would be a legal justification for Canada to declare war. That's because militaries are acting on behalf of the country while random citizens are not.
There's no reason for this to change unless you hold to the idea that somehow terrorism is worse than acts of war or war crimes which is pretty childish and ignorant.