China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens' desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.
Peaty
joined 1 year ago
And if you were mostly concrete you might not have needed either.
Why does it have to brutalist? The Empire State. Building is mostly concrete as are many buildings. What they shouldn't be is massive glass towers.
Climate change is coming and it doesn't give a fuck about your sense of aesthetics.
Not enough to offset the increased AC use to offset the fact the building is made of glass. We really should stop making buildings like this.
You can use it to figure out who around you has been in porn?
The kids one is more disturbing
Wait this is about Pimeyes? That's used to figure out who you know has an OnlyFans account, right?
Are you suggesting someone made a fake video featuring someone who looked like the woman in the article? Are you a clown by trade or just on lemmy?
Not when the trade off is a mostly glass building. Temperature control takes more energy than light.
What are you talking about? This is a glass office building in Chicago. It will leak heat and air conditioning because it is mostly glass. It should be made from concrete or stone as those are more environmentally friendly.
Israel only does surgical strikes with tactical explosives which were all trained to only blow up terrorists. /s
France is smaller than Texas. Every nation you mention was not a democracy during most of their rail construction. It is vastly easier to engage in large construction projects in authoritarian states because you don't have to care about a voting populace.