Or they have read things but cannot place it in context eg The Communist Manifesto was a response to problems Marx and Engles saw in capitalism whereas Smith was responding to issues with mercantilism.
Peaty
joined 1 year ago
Lemmygrad is the fringes as are hexbear and explodingheads
The claim then was even less believable as it was republican guard were dumping babies from incubators.
Well if those Eastern European nations would stop reacting to Russian imperialism by expressing a desire to join NATO then Russia wouldn't feel so threatened by NATO's expansion, so really it's the countries that Russia is invading's fault they were invaded. /s
I love the comment "they will wipe the floor with people". It seems most of their debate techniques revolve around not understanding the definition of common terms like "authoritarian" and then deciding they are correct.
That's just your sense of entitlement talking.
Wow that's really racist of you to presume that everyone in Gaza is in or supports Hamas.
Are you owed transparency regarding something you use but do not have any responsibility for? That sounds incredibly entitled to me.
My take is they are less defenders of copyright and are rather less interested in bearing the brunt of an infringement lawsuit caused by people posting content they do not have rights to.
So they like Warren Zevon?
I believe you are looking for KLF's song "3AM Eternal 1991"
There's no reason to bring any more of Marx into neoclassical economics than has already been taken. The stuff we left out was the invalid stuff