Obsession

Okay but the S3XY thing woukd he kinda clever and fun if he wasn't such a prick in every other way

Don't forget that the company he was most publicly visible in running (Twitter) is tanking

I run vanilla Kubernetes on 4 worker nodes and 3 control planes for high availability.

Unless you're some freak who enjoys K8S so much you don't want to ever get away from it, I don't recommend it

Where's the setting to turn them on? I don't see it

Phone in the front right pocket, wallet in the front left pocket, keys in the back pocket, earbuds in the watch pocket

Git is already decentralized - every contributor has a copy of the repo on their own machine.

At that point, it's just about using what's most popular. I have a slight preference toward gitlab myself, but the prevalence of github means I still push most of my projects to there, just because I'm already visiting the website so often.

This is so stupid it wraps right back around to being awesome

Right? It feels like the West is (slowly, tumultuously, two steps forward one step back) moving toward being more tolerant of different people and less tolerant of intolerance, except when that intolerance is due to religion. Then it's just "cultural differences" and should be respected???

There is no good answer to this question, because everyone has their own scale of what they consider harmful.

I think this is a fundamental problem with centralized social media a la Reddit, Twitter, Threads, etc. You're forcing countless different communities with different values and beliefs to share a common space, moderated by people with their own set of values. Of course there will be friction and problems. No matter what you do, there will be groups that feel like they're being censored, and other groups that feel like they're being attacked.

Every topic could be considered "harmful" to someone, somewhere on this planet.

Like someone else mentioned, content involving alcohol could be harmful to alcoholics. Content involving drugs could be harmful to addicts. Content discussing SA/Rape could be harmful to survivors.

Discussions on controversial topics will always be harmful to someone. Just a few posts up from this one was a discussion about Quran burning. That's harmful to devout and fundamentalist muslims, should that be banned?

Then let's not even get into the subject of humour. What one person considers banter could be considered harmful by another. Ironic communities suddenly become harmful as soon as the irony is lost on a single person (RIP 2balkan4u).

Harmful means something different to everyone. Trying to apply a blanket definition to it will just stifle all discussion, or turn your community into a pure hugbox.

Yup! I currently use it to backup my homelab configs encrypted to google drive, I would love to switch it over to proton drive instead.

I'm a devops engineer with a software engineering background. I've long had an interest in cybersecurity, mostly toward stuff like pentesting and ethical hacking. I'm not familiar with any of these books, would you recommend them, or nah?