Maeve

Bear with me, I'm trying to learn how to think again. Firstly, where can I find quality information, and I don't have money, so if it's not freely accessible, I'm not getting it, and if it is, I've no idea where to find it.

Secondly, I'm willing to hear you out while also noting Democrats (big D) are major benefactors of corporate greed (eg Pelosi not wanting insider trading laws, and the stock market probably ought to be illegal, in my limited perspective).

Thanks.

Your patience and calmness are infinite, and I wish I could follow you on this instance. I too have been conditioned toward alarmism but have been getting over it, and I see your point.

Like they kept telling us inflation was supply chain issues since COVID, but when you do the digging, it's corporate price-gouging, from corporate farm to corporate processors, to corporate distributors, to the corporate chain stores. The only ones ~not~ making huge profits are independent retailers, who may or not have a higher or lower price than a corporation, on any given good on any given day (that doesn't inherently make them good or evil). You're making me think and the conclusions are certainly not ThE oBvIoUs ones. Thank you.

The fairness doctrine? Eta: I'm aware it was for broadcast, but it used to be fairly standard, anyway, in print.

Before much longer, no one will be able to go out in daylight.

I've called companies that disconnect the call or "in order to connect you to the right agent, please tell us what you're calling about," them inevitably get it wing enough times to make you sit through a menu of about ten choices that are not correct and disconnect after three rounds of this nonsense.

"I'm sorry you're frustrated, perhaps it's time to start a new topic.'

"I'm not going to respond to that."

"I only use my powers for good!”

This is what total total institutionalization looks like, folks.

That last link..."freest country in the world" just means "most indoctrinated country in the world, and also slavers."

That's a very heavy read, and very necessary. I found several notable, paste-worthy quotes, but they were too many to be within bounds of "fair use." What was perhaps most shocking was that Starmer was a human rights lawyer, became a politician for the Palestinian genocide, and now claims to be against it. Any way the wind blows?

This article made me curious, so I searched. We've got work to do

Yes, I thought the article was about that and ideas for correcting neoliberalism and how to root it out, effectively. I was sorely disappointed.

I was thinking about this before scrolling comments. It seems many on the right support/vote for policies that actively make their quality of life seemingly better in the short term, and are surprised and disappointed when the long-term consequences of their decisions begin happening to become noticeable (usually more for me, less for thee?). When they discover the policies affect them, personally, they become angry and belligerent, looking to place blame on external factors. The left (I don't mean neoliberal) seem to go within, asking things like, "how did my voting choices affect this? What have I learned? How can I calibrate my choices for better results, going forward?" then try to make better decisions, even if it hurts them more, personally, in the short term, hoping for better across-the-board results long term?

I've just begun milling this, so I've no idea if this is correct or not. I'd love to see some research on it.