Not sure what you mean about legitimate businesses. I don't really trust any of them anymore. Those unsubscribe pages are still full of traps and they often don't keep you off new mailings that they can say you didn't explicitly unsubscribe from because this is a new newsletter that they thought you might be interested in. If I didn't opt-in, it's spam, and I'd like to think that maybe me labeling it as such might contribute to filters picking it up for someone else too.
Imgonnatrythis
joined 2 years ago
Unless you're hanging in pretty snooty coffee circles, chances still are that anything someone is going to offer you is going to be quite bad. For decent decaf, you really need to seek out good Swiss water process beans that are roasted just right (on the slightly darker side of medium imo). For me speciality coffee is largely about the adventure and nuance that each new bag of beans brings, but with decaf it's more like finding one or two that are pleasant - a familiar evening comfort treat rather than a tropical adventure in my mouth.
Gross for anyone to abuse tax money like this, but the guy is literally a criminal responsible for the deaths of innocent people he was tasked to govern as well as a traitor to the United States in the truest sense of the definition. The juxtaposition of this golf shit for someone that should be hanging at the end of a rope is infuriating.
Love that you got a crt for it too!
Unsubscribe is for real suckers only. When someone clicks that I always imagine some goon elbowing the guy next to him and saying something like, "look Keith we got another" unsubscriber" over here!" With a big goofy grin on his face.
So many people sing its praises but it's a swing and a miss for me too. Tastes like rando grocery store trader Joe's type chocolate to me.
As much as people are criticizing the proposed changes to this concept in the US, yes, this is true. In many countries that are arguably more free and democratic than the US even, this is not the way citizenship works and the post comes off as uninformed.
Just remember if there's a couch out on the curb, leave it alone.
I'll raise a shoe full of Bailey's to that! Well done sir!
Well yes. Garbage in garbage out of course.
I wouldn't say definitely. AI is subject to bias of course as well based on training, but humans are very much so, and inconsistently so too. If you are putting in a liver in a patient that has poorer access to healthcare they are less likely to have as many life years as someone that has better access. If that corellates with race is this the junction where you want to make a symbolic gesture about equality by using that liver in a situation where it is likely to fail? Some people would say yes. I'd argue that those efforts towards improved equality are better spent further upstream. Gets complicated quickly - if you want it to be objective and scientifically successful, I think the less human bias the better.
Sure. The goal is more perfect here, not perfect.