this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1325 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago

I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I'm very happy with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

That was a loud ball drop from Google’s hands.

[–] MindlessHunter4 16 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Glad I don't use chrome anymore. Though unfortunately everyone else I know still does.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

Webserial is only reason I see to install Chrome. For everything else Firefox works great.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 8 hours ago (15 children)

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

I’m mostly in the same boat. If you really want to know my kink-search-history, I really DGAF. The morality is nice to think about but it’s all about your personal morals in a lot of cases.

[–] stevedice 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can I have your bank account username and password?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

Awww, but understandable. Can I see your bank statements for the last 12 months?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Can I have your psychosexual profile and live gps coordinates?

[–] yunxiaoli 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Fish sadist, 47°9′S 126°43′W

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Like, a sadist for fish? Or a sadist that is a fish?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

A fish who is a sadist in his sexual relations with other fish obviously.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Ironically YouTube seems to work better for me in firefox, although the issue in chrome may be caused by browser extensions

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

never had a problem with firefox and youtube

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I know what he's talking about- there was some javascript spec or something that google proposed, and nobody else bought in, so it never actually became part of javascript's standard.

But google implemented it into chrome's javascript engine anyway, and then used it for youtube. There was some fallback code if the new functions weren't available, but, because of a 'mistake' they didn't work and basically made playback ass for a while until the open source community basically debugged and fixed the issue FOR google, and then spent a few weeks cramming it down google's throat that it needed fixed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

google does this kinda shit on purpose to reinforce their market position

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

One of the many reasons why Google should be splitted into different companies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There were a few extensions you could run in firefox that told youtube that it was totally for reals being accessed by a chrome browser.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn't need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn't use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate.

Its even worse than just hurting usability. Lots of ad networks are not policing their advertising customers and malicious payloads have been injected from ads. So allowing ads is a security risk because of the lack of security at the various ad networks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I was about to comment something similar but you said it before I did. Sometimes I'll mistakenly open YouTube with Chrome and then I realize I messed up because I have to sit through three, sometimes one-minute long ads just to watch a twenty second video. I'll typically just nope out and switch to Firefox. The worst thing is they're unskippable and I swear for some of them the ad actually pauses if you switch to another tab or browser. I'm getting ads even on super old videos so I'm pretty sure it isn't all to do with the channels themselves monetizing their videos.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

3 one minute long adds are better than those 2 hour long prageru racist propaganda videos trying to masquerade as "Educational" content

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›