After being mis-prescribed multiple times by multiple GPs, including one that would've had very bad results if the pharmacist hadn't caught it before handing over the pills, I'm wondering whether AI would've done a better job.
FellowEnt
Get them back in the safe right fucking now.
Gonna look great on that tacticool EDC belt brah
Not familiar with that particular lens but the full frame version is very well regarded. Definitely a setp up from amy kit lens. I would still advise looking at second hand and bear in mind EF mount lenses will work very well with an adapter. You will get more bang for buck if you avoid RF lenses for a while.
Highest quality would be a few cheap EF mount primes (or a single RF-S prime), most versatile would be a wide zoom. You might even have enough budget for a wide zoom and longer prime if you buy second hand.
I believe so, ao I only use it when I need to be silent like a ceremony or on set.
Absolutely, while being able to silently capture a 30FPS burst is kinda magic, it just feels wrong. I still shoot with mechanical shutter (at least second curtain), basically for the feels (and the extra bit depth).
There's a reason mirrorless is here to stay, the autofocus is basically cheat mode compared to a DSLR. I do miss some aspects of the optical viewfinder though.
Any modern mirrorless will have better autofocus, but that shouldn't be a concern as a beginner. The main reason I'd go with an older body is to allocate more budget to lenses. You'll see a far bigger impact from investing in decent glass vs a modern camera body.
"rocket-like, bullet-proof steel materials" nice one BBC
Because its an older body and the article authors wouldnt make affiliate income from the links.
I can wiggle my little toes independently.