Comment105

You can't just build shelter and grow food. All the land, clay, and wood is owned by someone else. You need to earn your land, clay, and wood. But we will give you some free food. We won't give you shelter, we were playing with the idea and kind of set it up, but decided to not really do that. We allow you to temporarily set up tents in our woods and pick some foods there, but you can't plant anything and you have to pay us if you want to hunt our animals, and if you camp in one place too long the forest police will arrest you. If you camp in our cities, we'll have the normal police chase you around. Maybe break your stuff, maybe beat you up. Sometimes we'll go farther. Don't camp in our cities.

I think it's actually more like 98 to 2

That must be more right than what I used to think, because it's certainly not any kind of freedom.

I don't think there's a place in the West that demands more obedience and denies more freedoms in the average man's life than USA does.

If humans did literally nothing ever at all, the world would be teeming with a lot more life.

The question in my mind is more about whether the local environment serves us without sacrificing too much of the natural environment, and a high maintenance cosmetic lawn doesn't serve me or nature at all.

Yeah, you don't use the 5e handbook as your character sheet, just like you don't use the Bible as your moral code.

You get to not play as a charitable and kind Christian if you don't want to, you can just as well play a greedy and mean subclass.

Paddington in Peru

lmfao

competently managed lol

maybe a few years of it to pump up the value, before it's dumped again.

Take one for the team, it'll shut it up and spare the rest of the neighborwood.

It's creative writing from a sad pro bono comedian bro, the green shirt and brown pants? Come on

I also have a feeling they didn't comb through the industrial areas or out-of-town camps.

Look, first you have to understand that even the most accurate, zero collateral damage bombings against ISIS and other such organizations were still morally worse than enslaving an equivalent amount of people from Xinjiang.

This is because the West is bad, what people want with their lives doesn't matter, and the Party is good.