Bobert

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bobert 5 points 1 year ago

Then you've been mislead. It hit the parking lot, damaged vehicles but left the building relatively intact and, besides windows, superficially damaged.

[–] Bobert 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you think it leveled the building? Have you seen such evidence?

[–] Bobert 56 points 1 year ago

This 1 fucking guy ruined ~~a whole~~ future generations of gaming with his greedy dumb fuck business ideas.

Ftfy

[–] Bobert 1 points 1 year ago

Just thought you should know

[–] Bobert 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Bobert -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How could you have? You were busy spreading your opinion around to people who didn't ask.

[–] Bobert -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] Bobert 0 points 1 year ago

News went with it

Lexicon > dictionary. See: Literally.

[–] Bobert 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Crimea circa 2014 disagrees

[–] Bobert 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I would like it corroborated with bonafide evidence rather than word of mouth of a belligerent party. I'm skeptical, but only for the above. I imagine if there is truth to this that a human rights watch dog will seek the same proof.

But with that said, I didn't need a report like that to condemn Hamas for this renewed conflict in the first place. This does absolutely nothing to help the Palestinians and absolutely everything to hurt them. Every way you slice this you just end up with senseless tragedy and loss of life on every side.

[–] Bobert 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean you opened your mouth wide enough for your foot with that one. I don't know what you expected to happen when commenting about a geopolitical situation that's grown a gravity so large it's collapsed in on itself to the point that because your comment doesn't specify a side it can be validly used by someone on either side of the debate.

[–] Bobert 15 points 1 year ago

That's not what-aboutism.

What they're referring to deserves to be talked about and brought up as it is demonstrably intrinsic to a conversation concerning Israel-Palestine relations.

Had they brought up literally any other country it would be what-aboutism. You can't just throw that term around every time someone issues a counterpoint that you don't feel is valid.

 
view more: next ›