ArtemZ

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Hope @ruud is prepared for Jun 30 when RIF will go down... redditors will flood us

 

Seriously, this lw looks like arabic script

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I still can't believe it will actually happen...RIF was Reddit on mobile phone for me. Killing it is like killing reddit itself. Well, yeah, good luck

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Well, I guess it will work out if Switzerland manages to sell it's CO2 emissions to other countries.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

there is lemmynsfw.com for you already

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, the fact that such immature software is capable of being a viable alternative to one of the biggest websites on the internet is already super impressive.

Let's see where we will head in a couple of years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At publishing time, state officials in Texas were willing to discuss accepting San Francisco as a new city with the condition that it stop being super gay.

Lol. I'd put them on drug probation instead.

On a more serious note, it is maddening that the most naturally beautiful places (California, Oregon and Washington) are going down the sink thanks to liberal politics.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Ethical concerns and uncertainty: Gender affirming care for children involves making irreversible decisions that can have long-term physical, psychological, and social consequences. While it is important to prioritize the well-being of children, there is ongoing debate within the medical community regarding the appropriate age at which such interventions should be considered and whether they are in the best interest of the child. Some medical professionals argue that children may lack the cognitive maturity to fully comprehend the implications of such interventions and that it is necessary to approach these matters cautiously.

  2. Lack of long-term research: The field of gender affirming care for children is relatively new, and there is a lack of comprehensive long-term research on the outcomes of these interventions. This means that the long-term effects, both positive and negative, of gender affirming care on children are still not fully understood. Without sufficient evidence-based data, it can be challenging to determine the best course of action and ensure that these interventions are truly beneficial and minimize harm.

  3. Exploration and self-identity: Childhood and adolescence are periods of self-exploration and identity development. Some argue that it is crucial to allow children the freedom to explore and question their gender identity without prematurely committing to medical interventions. Taking a more cautious approach and providing supportive counseling, therapy, and non-permanent interventions may allow for a more holistic exploration of identity, taking into account the child's social, emotional, and psychological well-being.

  4. Ethical considerations of irreversible interventions: Gender affirming care for children often involves irreversible medical interventions such as hormone therapy or surgeries. It is essential to consider the potential impact on the child's future well-being if they later question or regret the decision made during their youth. By waiting until the child reaches an age of greater maturity and self-awareness, they can make a more informed decision about their gender identity and weigh the potential consequences of irreversible interventions.

  5. Parental rights and autonomy: Decisions regarding a child's gender affirming care should be primarily left to the parents, as they are responsible for the well-being of their children. It is important to respect the rights of parents to make decisions they believe are in the best interest of their child, as long as the child is not being subjected to harm or neglect. By allowing a diversity of perspectives and not imposing a single medical consensus, the autonomy and decision-making power of parents can be preserved.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Medical professionals In the U.S was performing lobotomy less than 50 years ago and there was general consensus that it is beneficial within the country, but it was criticized outside, e.g in Soviet Union. Right now there is some consensus that minors can consent to sex change within the U.S mostly, but it is mostly unheard of outside. Same pattern in my opinion.

 

cross-posted from: https://exploding-heads.com/post/94477

cross-posted from: https://exploding-heads.com/post/94475

The decision to halt the universal prescription of life-altering drugs is long overdue considering there was never any evidence that permanently manipulating a child’s body would remedy his or her mental struggles.

In recent years, pharmaceutical companies and bureaucracies began marketing a sterilizing chemical regime as a way to “pause” puberty for the growing number of kids who claim to struggle with gender dysphoria.

On the contrary, the increasing body of evidence shows that pumping kids full of neutering drugs causes irreversible harm, including sexual dysfunction and permanent infertility, a higher risk of cancer and cardiac events, impaired vocal cords, bone density issues, and transition regret.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/98154

From the article... “It is clear that Lily’s mother, who self-administered the drugs to induce a late term abortion, is filled with remorse and is relying on mental health services. The real fault in this tragedy lies strongly with abortion providers who pushed for dangerous home abortions, and are now using this case to push for abortion up to birth.”

 

A community with questions and answers about russians, their culture and customs!

https://lemmy.world/c/askarussian

[email protected]

 

Will we have ULTRA MAGA flairs?

 

Jцsт шоNDERIИG

view more: next ›