I like your example because so many others are convinced the question was about capitalism. It applies to any state seeking to protect itself and sometimes its citizens.
AmidFuror
Sounds like she walked off on her own accord, not due to the recommendations of any security team.
I prefer people who can laugh at themselves in moments like these.
I thought you were suppose to adopt out all the children to parents back in your homeland.
I think you mean opinionated headlines. But you're right. This post is trash. Disney did a bad thing, but it's nothing like what's in the post title (which isn't the article headline).
Disney is arguing the case should go to arbitration, not that it is legal for them to kill someone. Obviously their argument in arbitration would be that is isn't their fault the death occured.
You're right. I was considering adding more of the quote so it didn't look like I was leaving out context, but I wanted to highlight the phrase that confused me. It looks like I just ignored "for churches" mentally for some reason. I will edit.
[...] a potentially worrisome trend of young women eschewing religion.
Say what?
Edit: Never mind. I skipped over the phrase "for churches," which explains to whom this would be worrisome.
“I have little doubt that given my close relationship with my brothers, at some juncture, a lawyer or many lawyers will soon try to lump me in with the allegations against Alon and Oren,” Tal reportedly wrote in an email to colleagues[....]
Or, and this makes more sense, he had little doubt because he had also engaged in illegal activity.
The dose makes the poison. What was the benzene level in Perrier compared to these medicines, and then how much was a person likely to consume in a year? Without a discussion of dose, it's pretty meaningless.
California has Prop 65, which is rendered virtually useless because everything is carcinogenic to some degree.
I don't know about you, but I consume water more often than cold medicine.
Getting Maduro out would help Venezuela a lot. Sending Trump, not so much.
Second paragraph in the article listed:
boosted lies, coordinated harassment, and hateful memes
I bet they may have put more details in the article.
What doctors is he working with and what would their role be in this dispute?