AgentGoldfish

I wouldn't call 3 extra days "much better".

You're talking about the Netherlands? It's 5 days fully paid.

I can take several months if I want it, but I have to take a 30% pay cut, which we can't afford. Paternity leave in the Netherlands sucks.

I taught English in Japan (JET) for one year, and at the end I said what a lot of people say: I'd love to visit, but I'm never going to work here again.

The work culture in Japan is fucked. The fact that the amount of time you spend at work, not your actual output, determines how "productive" you are is so fucking stupid. I worked my contract hours and I was seen as lazy. Despite the fact that everything I was asked to do was always done and done well, the fact that I didn't come in 2 hours early and nap at my desk meant I was lazy. Add onto that the fact that I only got a (generous for Japan) 15 days of nenkyuu (paid days off), which you can't actually use because what happens if you get sick. Sick leave exists, but does it? Does it really? The one time I tried to use it, I was told "it'd be better for everyone if you didn't", and then had to use my nenkyuu anyway.

And that was me working a pretty privileged position! If I was coming from Vietnam to work in a retirement home, I'm sure the working conditions would be far worse with the threat of deportation looming over my head. Immigration is a band aid at best. As soon as immigrants have the opportunity to move somewhere better, they will of course take that.

In contrast, I now live in the Netherlands, which shockingly has some of the least generous child benefits in the EU. And yet, we get about 100€/month from the government in support, plus about 50% the cost of childcare paid for. My wife gets 4 months of maternity leave at full pay (I only get 5 days which is super fucked), with up to 3 years at 60% pay with a guarantee of her job being there when she gets back. We each have 25+ days off a year, which are actually used for days off, if the kid gets sick, we can use sick leave to care for it, and sick leave is unlimited. Also, healthcare for children is 100% paid by the government. And with all of that, we're barely in a position to be able to consider having children.

Not me but my partner.

She was working as a research assistant in a lab for several years. She asked her boss if she could be promoted to a research associate, which was one level above her. She already been doing the job of a researcher (3 levels above her). Her boss said that they were in a hiring freeze and that it wouldn't be possible, but maybe in 2-3 YEARS she might be up for a promotion. Her boss wanted everyone to get the most they possibly could out of their current position before promotion. What my partner heard was that even if she eventually got the promotion to the next level, it might be 5-7 years after that promotion until the next promotion.

I've never seen her so angry when she came home. She immediately started applying to new jobs in a different field. She also stopped doing work above her pay grade, to which her boss actually tried to retaliate against her. Within 2 months, she moved onto a new job that is 75% WFM, pays more, has a better culture and is in a field where she can much more easily move upward.

Her former company has started layoffs.

No he didn't.

He's announced he won't be on the party list on the next election, but he's still going to be the caretaker PM until the next election. He's still in office, which again, this terrible article makes it sound like he's not.

The AP source is clearer about this (though the title is still problematic). The Indian news took the AP source and made it worse.

This is poorly written at best and outright misinformation at worst. But maybe don't source news about Dutch politics from an Indian news source?

Anyway, Rutte resigned the cabinet, he didn't personally resign. He said "my government can no longer do its job" not " I can no longer do my job".

The way this is written it makes it sound like the latter, where Rutte personally resigned, which is definitely not the case. Especially considering Rutte is blaming literally everyone else for his cabinet collapsing.

Where I live it's only legal to use the horn to prevent serious situations, so someone doing this could (and would) be fined by police/eventually lose their license.

Even in places where this isn't directly illegal, is it illegal to make loud noises after certain hours? If so, that could be a reason to call the police or make some kind of official complaint against the driver.

Also, have you tried talking to this person? Maybe they don't realize that its disrupting literally everyone (a lot of people forget that other people are not just NPCs).

Top box. It's legal to filter forward where I live, and while side bags definitely look better IMO, they add to the overall width of the bike, which makes filtering much harder.

As it stands now, if I can get my mirrors past two cars, I can get through. If I had side bags, I would be able to tell until after i get stuck.

I live in the Netherlands, where a huge percentage of people commute by bicycle.

People also don't want to go back into the office here either. My work has been begging people to actually come back into the office (another advantage of NL is that worker protections make it really hard to fire people, and firing people who are working hard just not from the place the employer wants is unlikely to be successful).

So I think this idea is largely irrelevant to cars/driving.

I’m not sure if this backlash will actually cause any change because for businesses it’s a win as long as even one person decides to tip and it costs them nothing to have the option on.

I'm a university lecturer, and this sounds a lot like students who will ask for extra credit/more points because "it can't hurt". And if one of their professors/lecturers gives them extra points one time, it's worth it for those students. To them, it costs nothing to ask, they can only gain, and there are no downsides.

But there are, just not directly. My students think that the worst thing I can do is say no and their score stays the same. But I can also be less lenient in the future (which I definitely am with grade grubbers). I will also refuse to write letters of recommendation or supervise theses for students that do this shit, because I genuinely don't want to deal with those students anymore.

You are right that it does not directly cost businesses money to have that option. But it can still cost them in the long run. I know I'm less likely to support businesses that pull this bullshit, especially if they try harder to guilt you. Also, it's increasingly giving the appearance that needing to give tips means that workers are underpaid, so by turning on that option, the business is effectively announcing that they underpay their staff, which is a bad look for the business.

They can’t get to see content that they used to, and despite not creating it themselves, or doing ANYTHING other than consuming it, they feel entitled to access it, as if it were “theirs”.

I completely agree with you.

I was a mod on an advice sub (that I recreated over here), and people would message modmail after posting and say "why is no one commenting on my post". Like, you aren't entitled to free advice, you're asking for it. But people would get legitimately angry whenever they wouldn't get any advice, or if the advice they got wasn't what they were looking for.

The thing that made me the most angry were the people who would delete their post after getting advice. Like people wrote comments for everyone to read, not just for you, and then you go and defacto make those comments private?

I fully believe that audience of people does not understand that they aren't the center of the universe and that there are actual people on the other end of comments...