5wim

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's what the comment you replied to starts with.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Your comment makes sense in the frame of "ugly people are allowed to make music," my comment refers to the "music was better" part of the post.

The ugly people you mentioned don't support your comment's argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not "better."

Some music sucked in the boomer's days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (8 children)

But the contention is about music being better, and that's some bad music.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Like tent poles and aircraft ĥulls. Checks out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I'm aware, and agree

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Well I think you bought "Aluminum Free," whereas the one on the left doesn't say that. That brand sells both aluminum-full snd aluminum-free.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Dammit this whole post was an ad pack it up boys

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The bootlicking version of "why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?"

view more: next ›