sh.itjust.works

27,609 readers
1,298 users here now

Useful Links

Rules:

Règles :

Fediseer
Fediseer
Matrix

Other UI options (more to come)

Monitoring Services
lemmy-meter.info

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
TheDude
imaqtpie
kersploosh
InEnduringGrowStrong
SJW_Bot
MichelleG
SJW_Bot2
listing: all - local
search
1
1
Jails banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls as part of a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with prison phone companies (arstechnica.com)
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/10665806

Crossposted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/13937769

Across the United States, hundreds of jails have eliminated in-person family visits over the last decade. Why has this happened? The answer highlights a profound flaw in how decisions too often get made in our legal system: for-profit jail telecom companies realized that they could earn more profit from phone and video calls if jails eliminated free in-person visits for families. So the companies offered sheriffs and county jails across the country a deal: if you eliminate family visits, we'll give you a cut of the increased profits from the larger number of calls. This led to a wave across the country, as local jails sought to supplement their budgets with hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from some of the poorest families in our society.

2
32
Jails banned visits in “quid pro quo” with prison phone companies, lawsuits say (arstechnica.com)
3
150
Jails banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls as part of a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with prison phone companies (arstechnica.com)
 
 

Crossposted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/13937769

Across the United States, hundreds of jails have eliminated in-person family visits over the last decade. Why has this happened? The answer highlights a profound flaw in how decisions too often get made in our legal system: for-profit jail telecom companies realized that they could earn more profit from phone and video calls if jails eliminated free in-person visits for families. So the companies offered sheriffs and county jails across the country a deal: if you eliminate family visits, we'll give you a cut of the increased profits from the larger number of calls. This led to a wave across the country, as local jails sought to supplement their budgets with hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from some of the poorest families in our society.

4
6
Jails banned visits in "quid pro quo" with prison phone companies, lawsuits say (arstechnica.com)
 
 

HN Discussion

5
960
Jails banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls as part of a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with prison phone companies (arstechnica.com)
 
 

Across the United States, hundreds of jails have eliminated in-person family visits over the last decade. Why has this happened? The answer highlights a profound flaw in how decisions too often get made in our legal system: for-profit jail telecom companies realized that they could earn more profit from phone and video calls if jails eliminated free in-person visits for families. So the companies offered sheriffs and county jails across the country a deal: if you eliminate family visits, we'll give you a cut of the increased profits from the larger number of calls. This led to a wave across the country, as local jails sought to supplement their budgets with hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from some of the poorest families in our society.

6
296
Michigan Jails banned visits in “quid pro quo” with prison phone companies, lawsuits say (arstechnica.com)
 
 

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240401124019/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/jails-banned-family-visits-to-make-more-money-on-video-calls-lawsuits-claim/

7
138
Jails banned visits in “quid pro quo” with prison phone companies, lawsuits say (arstechnica.com)
 
 

Civil rights group sues two counties, says hundreds more have banned visits.

view more: next ›