this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

25 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
RX7700XT Pulse 3GHz @Dying Light 2 with Raytracing and FSR2 (alien.top)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  1. :)
  2. my Pulse runs at ~3GHz when playing Dying Light 2 (1080p FSR2 Quality + Raytracing)
  3. why does nobody talk about FSR2.1 looking better with RDNA3 than before? (had RX580 4G before)
  4. dont mind my old R7 2700X with disabled PBO - my 5800X3D arrived today so i updated BIOS beforehand

~3GHz

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It may look 'better' because of It working at higher FPS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

higher fps does nothing for visual clarity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

The more frames you have the clearer picture is in motion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

fsr works temporally so the more frames you have the more information its works with to resolve the image and get better results

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Is there a way to say it looks better just because of the higher FPS or just outright looks better because the higher FPS gives more information?

Also, how does this translates to if using locked FPS? less info to process?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Sort of. It's more like you're less likely to see the issues because each frame is on screen less time. It isn't getting any more temporal information than at least fps. So "sorta"