this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
RX7700XT Pulse 3GHz @Dying Light 2 with Raytracing and FSR2 (alien.top)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  1. :)
  2. my Pulse runs at ~3GHz when playing Dying Light 2 (1080p FSR2 Quality + Raytracing)
  3. why does nobody talk about FSR2.1 looking better with RDNA3 than before? (had RX580 4G before)
  4. dont mind my old R7 2700X with disabled PBO - my 5800X3D arrived today so i updated BIOS beforehand

~3GHz

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It may look 'better' because of It working at higher FPS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

higher fps does nothing for visual clarity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The more frames you have the clearer picture is in motion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

fsr works temporally so the more frames you have the more information its works with to resolve the image and get better results

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Is there a way to say it looks better just because of the higher FPS or just outright looks better because the higher FPS gives more information?

Also, how does this translates to if using locked FPS? less info to process?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sort of. It's more like you're less likely to see the issues because each frame is on screen less time. It isn't getting any more temporal information than at least fps. So "sorta"