DO IT DO IT DO IT DO IT DO IT
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
408 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19223 readers
2724 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part! You can't even passively take part! And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels ... upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop! And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!
-Mario Savio, In a speech during a protest with his university at the time, but the words always seem appropriate to these situations.
In this case I attach free to "free to live without fear that losing your job means losing your life."
Sampled well in linkin park's wretches and kings
Also inspired the title of an album by Noun (Marissa Paternoster of Screaming Females side project) : https://marissapaternoster.bandcamp.com/album/throw-your-body-on-the-gears-and-stop-the-machine-with-your-blood-2
Unlike Vogue, Teen Vogue has been pretty political ever since one of their writers (Lauren Duca, who is pretty cool) argued with Tucker Carlson on his show in 2016.
It is, surprisingly, one of the better publications to get news and commentary from nowadays, because nobody really expect it.
Wow I had no idea! Kinda like buzzfeed news was legit af for awhile there
I laugh every time I see teenvogue.com under a headline link because it's not where I'd expect quality but I know it will be. I take it as a sign teens are becoming more politically active, which is the only way progressives win. It makes me just a tiny bit hopeful.
That's a really well-written article, the complete opposite of a fluff piece.
I encourage folks to go read it.
In Teen Vogue of all places.
Teen vogue, believe it or not, has a decent publishing track record:
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/pretrial-detention-punishes-poor
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/clarence-thomas-luxury-trips-gifts-corruption
Right? I wouldn't have known about it if I hadn't stumbled across the author on BlueSky.
Teen Vogue's op-eds are usually incredibly well done. It feels like they've stepped up as a quality voice for young progressives. I love it and wish they'd been that deep in my teen years lol
I went and read it (skimmed) after reading your comment, and I completely agree. This is a very well thought out piece.
I hope Mr. Fain keeps good security around him. His actions are challenging the current order and threatening both the billionaire and political classes. There is no doubt in his mind that there are members of those classes working out how to make him disappear from the public stage, one way or another. He would not be the first labor leader in this nation to come to a violent end at the hands of corporate or political leaders.
It seems more and more lately that organized labor is the only viable route for meaningful political change. Recasting the individualistic neoliberal interpretations of social justice in to the context of labor organizing and agitation seems like the right message to be sending right now, and not white-washing reactionary aspects of that history either but explaining how they undermined it.
The challenge in the present day is that this really requires going beyond culture war factions for greater common cause, working with people you may disagree yet have shared material interests with, with the hopes that the effort itself will absolve these barriers and lead to a better class solidarity. I don't know if this is possible in the US right now with the rise of the fascist impulses on the right, is it possible for the left to acknowledge the structural stresses pushing people in that direction and offer a more appealing solution? The liberal strategy of dismissing those structural causes only seems to be further enabling the right. "An injury to one is an injury to all" may be too radical a notion for this context, and you can bet the bosses are happy about this working class division. I refuse to accept the workers cant find each other again. Yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one.
This article makes it sound realistic. It would be several parallel strikes by unions across various industries. Leadership is always the struggle for these causes, and the plan discussed here is handling that perfectly.
Oh yeah this action specifically is totally doable, I mean the broader political context and labor as a political faction that breaks through the partisan culture war.
I tend to find calls for a general strike laughable and unrealistic, so believe me when I say this is an amazing article. The general strike being referred to here would be a targeted effort by some unions spanning industries. Fain cleverly surmises that would bring the country to a halt. He recognizes that you don't need a ton of people. You don't need much to clog up the works, and I think it's actually better this way. Other sectors and industries will gradually be effected by those striking, which creates even more pressure for companies to concede to union demands. It's a domino effect.
The author deserves a lot of credit here. He isn't just waffling, there's a lot of substance. Other progressive publications would do well to view this as a prime example. This author has written a very logical and sensible article, where others tend to write fluff pieces which feel like campaigns and preaching.
After reading the article I not only signed up for Teen Vogue's political newsletter, I signed up for the United Autoworkers Union newsletter too and I'm not even part of a Union!
If you enjoyed the article check out a book by the same author. Fight like hell, the untold history of American labor
$20 on the IWW's website
A revelatory and inclusive history of the American labor movement, from independent journalist and Teen Vogue labor columnist Kim Kelly.
There's more info in the description at the link for those interested. I might pick this up at my library to give a read.
If I didn't already pay union dues I'd be tempted to join IWW or something similar, although it's more an advocacy group at this point. Also been happy to see Jacobin covering the labor movement.