this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Apple

17238 readers
155 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they do they become the undisputed king of portability.

It baffles me why Apple didn’t push more proactively sharing cellular over their devices, but it always seemed that it was because of cellular models or cellular companies pressure.

I’m still waiting for the moment you can use cellular as a WiFi backup in a laptop without having to push a button.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Patents and a quagmire of legal hurdles. They have long complained about Qualcomms pricing structure. A company like that has a lock on the industry even Apple can’t fully circumvent without significant costs.

It’s sort of the last piece in the puzzle. Once they get their modems, they become a fully unified system.

You talk about boosting network stability? That’s just the start when you control all the airwaves.

[–] RespectfullyNo 3 points 9 months ago

Could you elaborate on your last sentence?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I have half memories of patents for Mac Laptops with cellular modems from like… the late PowerPC early Intel era.

I wonder what’s changed to make Apple give the green light? Certainly isn’t cellular prices.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

There was a prototype that popped up on ebay out of nowhere back around 2011. Seemingly made it pretty late into development before the idea was canned.

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/14/photos-of-a-prototype-macbook-pro-with-integrated-3g-cellular-data/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I’ve heard part of the issue is Qualcomm’s licensing is a percentage of the devices selling cost, so putting the same cellular chip in a MacBoom Pro costs a lot more than putting it in an iPhone. If Apple can make their own chips and doesn’t have to pay that fee it becomes a lot more affordable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe patents

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Strange, considering most cell phones have a wireless tether mode. Why would you need a modem in your laptop?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Tethering burns through battery and a laptop's battery is much bigger. I believe Apple's smallest laptop battery has roughly three times the capacity as their biggest iPhone battery. Tethering works well for occasional use but if you've got a job where spend pretty much your whole work day roaming around to different locations, having it built in can be quite useful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unless physically disconnected it's a nice place for a backdoor

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I’d prefer less privacy invasive features.

I don’t get people who downvoted your comment. Like your MacBook can literally connect against your well if apple wants especially with eSIM cards.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 9 months ago

For computers, that sounds broadly positive. But when this shit shows up in "smart TVs" there will be no way to keep them disconnected. That option will not be built in.

[–] HootinNHollerin 1 points 9 months ago

I had that in my ThinkPad in like 2008