Valve taking 25 years to patch their game?
/s
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
28 points (83.3% liked)
Games
17183 readers
340 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's less of a "forever" now. Lots of games are a buggy mess on release and then get patched into a great game months later.
Still a bad move, but it's not like pre internet "forever"
Its more about reputation. If ur game launches bad, it will always be known as a bad game to most.
No man's sky launched in a bad state, now it's a really good game, but it's still got that mark on it.
I think NMS is still a terrible game. It's an okay sandbox and a neat tech demo for procedural systems, but the actual components and mechanics that make it a game are extremely shallow at best and frankly idiotic at worst.
Miyamoto didn’t actually say it?
Found this while looking around, he either did or did not say it in an interview with The Guardian in 2001, but it was also said by some people a few years earlier.
I'm not entirely convinced, having read the quote from The Guardian in an interview they did with Miyamoto, you'd think that'd be proof enough. People in the associated Twitter thread really decided that it was just unsourced.