To summarize, an anonymous source provides stories of unverified issues without evidence that if true would be grounds for lawsuits that one would immediately pursue if the evidence actually existed, all presented by a non-local "news" site owned by Tea Party conservatives. Note the way the stories are presented—a situation is set up, but there's no further detail that explains a connection to fraud or ballot harvesting. When they say ballots were already turned in or someone supposedly voted twice, they don't tell you which party benefited (spoiler alert: most verified voter fraud is committed by people voting for Republicans). I look forward to this activist stepping forward with their verifiable evidence and I will applaud any attempts to bring any perpetrators of illegal activities to justice with due process of law, regardless of which political ideology they align with.
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
I suppose this would matter more if the popular vote decided the election