Wasn't he the guy with the sex cult-like sanctuary? If so he's probably got a lot more to hide.
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
238 points (98.0% liked)
News
23664 readers
3528 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's the one.
Pretty sure it's his son who was uploading "adorable" animal clips to various social media sites. They'd get thousands of people to upvote/like/favorite them and you'd maybe get a handful of people in the comments mentioning it's Doc's son. Highly likely he was following in the footsteps of his father and most people were oblivious because aw so cute.
Mid 2020 was weird we were willing to give anyone a pass if they entertained us for a few hours.
I don't think anyone gave him a pass. Everyone involved in this were sketchy as fuck but this guy didn't have anything directly illegal to pin on him.
The real pass was early 2000 when he appeared on talkshows and stuff. I always assumed that the guys doing it were from conservation focused and reputable zoos like Steve Irvin but a lot of them were just these weirdos.
This guy was the sketchiest from my view. Dude was straight grooming girls to be his sex and work slaves.
That's been my experience my entire life.
And once again, its show that the only descent person on that docu-drama was the one the public hated most.
No, the libertarian kid who witnessed the shooting was the most sympathetic person.
Who? The woman?
That's probably who they mean but iirc even she abused people's eagerness to "help out" to get unpaid labour out of them or something like that. I remember the labour situation at her place being strange.
It's called volunteer work and its pretty common (and legal) for non-profits and NGOs.
You might remember the show better than me but I think the issue was them making money out of that volunteer work and how weird and seemingly abusive they were towards those volunteers. That's the feeling I got out of it and the news that has come out since.
The "documentary" was incredibly biased in favor of the crack head and against the lady who rescue the tigers.
Big Cat Rescue is a top rated charity
Wasn't it their volunteers who talked about their situation? Been a while since I saw it.
How pathetic that the DOJ needs Netflix to find the criminals.