this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
88 points (87.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

28979 readers
300 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If they could somehow monetize breathing, they would

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Private healthcare has got this covered

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ouch my sides. From laughter though, I don't want to increase my premiums.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, there's a principle of nature...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That you gotta go get food if you want to eat?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If air were a limited resource, rather than one available in great abundance, it probably would be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The air has already been made in to a limited resource, killing millions annually:

  • Air pollution is one of the greatest environmental risk to health. By reducing air pollution levels, countries can reduce the burden of disease from stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and both chronic and acute respiratory diseases, including asthma.

  • In 2019, 99% of the world’s population was living in places where the WHO air quality guidelines levels were not met.

  • The combined effects of ambient air pollution and household air pollution are associated with 6.7 million premature deaths annually.

  • Ambient (outdoor) air pollution is estimated to have caused 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide in 2019.

  • Some 89% of those premature deaths occurred in low- and middle-income countries, and the greatest number in the WHO South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions.

Source - WHO

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, they're working on it...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Come on, Cohaagen. You got what you want. Give those people air."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If air were an economic resource, we’d probably need some kind of economic system for distributing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Well-regulated capitalism on the other hand has resulted in an explosion of technological advancement like no other era in human history.

The key is regulation. Not too little, but not too much either. Some things, like minimum wage, are clearly under regulated. Other things, like mandating USB-C, are honestly better left to the free market (and I fucking love USB-C.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tw: rape

You realize that, capitalism, if left EVER unrelated, will use power to endlessly underregulate itself and just gain more power?

This is like saying "firing a gun in my mouth doesn't kill me as long as I live". Sure, it's true I guess, but it's also so, so inherently wrong.

I've been trying to do what you're doing now for so long. But in reality, you have to take a look at what capitalism really is: it's a form of power designation that designates that power with the powerful, or pedantically, with capital, but it's the same thing, for all intents and purposes. And THAT is an unbalanced system from the get-go, right off the bat.

It's also like saying "slave systems are SUPER productive!". Like, sure, they are. But they're also incredibly destructive and prevent a lot of other things from happening.

It's also like saying "a lot of sex happens when you rape somebody". Sure, yes, I guess that's technically a true statement. But.... It's an unwanted power imbalance that hasn't accounted for what would have happened to the victim OR the rapist had they not raped somebody. The rapist could have developed into a normal human being and even fell in love or had a lot of consensual casual sex, and the victim could have stayed not raped and been perfectly happy progressing through their life not raped.

It's just such a half baked, biscuit brained thought and statement. You literally cannot compare our tech right now to the past because technology typically progresses exponentially ANYWAY. You cannot know what would have happened or what would happen if not capitalism, because we've had nothing BUT it for basically all of human history. Every time we even want to try something else, capitalism LITERALLY attacks it with everything it's got and refuses to ever let up until there's nothing but ashes, and a lot of those places are capitalist. Native Americans? IMPERIALISM BECAUSE OF CAPITALISM.

Greed kills selflessness every time in every experiment as long as it exists and is given the smallest chance.

Capitalism is cancer; it just mindless destroys everything in it's path, along with itself, only existing and leeching as long as its host stays alive.

You gotta read some more books and history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the systems is still inherently flawed and based on exploiting nature and people. Trying to make a system that is based on "infinite growth" adhere to the reality of our finite world is like telling a warrior society that they should start being peaceful

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Regulation helps to work around the problem but doesn't fix anything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

All systems dealing with human nature will inherently be flawed and require workarounds and bandaids.

There is no perfect system, but throughout human history, capitalism seems to have consistently resulted in technological growth and improved outcomes in terms of health, lifespan, creature-comforts, etc.

We tried communism - over 30 countries did - and the only ones left are China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos. Interestingly, current and previous communist states got a lot closer to "regulating breathing" than anything we have today. It's not a good look as far as stable and free systems go.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I used to think this was true too, but then I realized that the fundamental problem with capitalism is that it's incompatible with democracy and regulation. That's why literally every capitalist country on earth (including the wealthy ones) has a problem with regulatory capture, corruption, and buyout and supplanting of the actual government.

Capitalism encourages the greediest, trickiest, and most selfish people to rise to the top and stay there through a mixture of brute force and media manipulation. In essence, it's not much different than totalitarian authoritarian governments, it's just more subtle.

Look at Fox news and right wing media bubbles for instance, or the Democratic party which opposes ranked choice voting whenever it can and constantly says one thing and does another. Humans are too greedy, selfish, and short-sighted to live and exist for long under a system like capitalism. How do we know this? Look around, climate change and pollution's already serious and it's not changing anytime soon.

We're probably already fucked, and we just don't know how much we are just yet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am pro healthy capitalism too (including strong welfare state) but don't agree that capitalism deserves any credit for technological advancement. Science does. And there shouldn't be any comparison between the totalitarian states and free-capitalism states of the past. We can't give credit to a thief for prosperity because he is not a murderer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fine, so long as you ban campaign donations and most forms of lobbying.

Otherwise regulation goes to the highest bidder.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is why I prefer socialism over capitalism.

In socialism, I’d be poor and have no choice of what I buy or eat but I can live and afford having children.

In capitalism, where you have freedom, the same rules applies to poor and rich citizens. The difference is that the rich can afford lawyers and are able to lobby to change/break the law on their favor. You don’t.

This is how the cost of living would go 100% up and you wage increase by 1.34% each year.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

you do know that under a socialist system worker-owned companies would compete in the market right? you’d still have lots of choice lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I’m interested to know more.

Some people only think of bad vibes of the Soviet Union when anyone talk bad about capitalism.

In my country, we have free healthcare, free education, livable wages, free market.

We’re not capitalist tho. A mix of socialism and capitalism.

100% communism is bad, 100% capitalism is bad, 100% socialism is bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

socialism isn’t just “government owns/provides everything.

There are different flavours. One of which entails workers owning the companies they work for, rather than the state owning everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That is the point capitalists cannot comprehend.

Twitter have resources to crush small social media apps. Monopoly is a serious issue in capitalism.

If people own a company similar how lemmy is open source then they would have resources to fight back big corporations.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a worker under capitalism. The owner tells me how to work. I sell my time for money. I produce value for the owner. The owner keeps the difference between the value I produce and the money for which I sold my time. The excess value after paying for my time is kept by the owner. I have money to buy products.

I am a worker under socialism. I decide how to work with other workers. I produce value. I provide my value to those in need.

I prefer to own my time and value. I do not want to pay a state to give money to owners. I do not want to empower a state to use violence if I do not comply.

I am not sure how communism, socialism and capitalism are being used here. I am an anarchist. I would say states are bad, owners are bad, heirarchy is bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Totally agree.

What I mean is the state should define rules and enforce them. And for critical industries the state can support / supplement the companies.

This way big corps cannot have monopoly.

My main issue with capitalism/ USA system is lobbying and allowing corps to do what ever they want in the fine print.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Regardless of how you're defining capitalism and socialism, you haven't changed systems if all you do is change which private entity owns the company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could a worker-owned company sell itself to a single person, and become a company owned by one person?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's called freelancing. That's already a thing and isn't an issue because the worker is getting the fruits of their labor - there's no capitalist making money off another person's labor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if the workers agreed to, collectively.

Democracy would decide

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All systems fall to corruption. All. I believe an A or B choice is cheating humanity out of new solutions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed about corruption.

But some systems are better than others.

In USA, as a billionaire, you can screw people and lobby aka “bribe” to get what you want.

And at the end, you pay 0 taxes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already have monetised breathing: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2021/mar/01/take-a-deep-breath-how-cornish-air-sells-for-60-a-bottle-even-if-its-from-devon

It might seem like just a schtick to con rich people, and it currently is, but that doesn't change the fact that there are scammers out there literally "collecting" air in jars (I saw a segment on them a while ago on tv, they even got a "collection net" out thinking it made them look less like scammers. It didn't) and selling it to Chinese people (who's own air is so bad because their production is trying to keep up with wester demand) for profit.

And it isn't just out of touch rich people who need to do this though, they're just the only ones who can afford to waste their money on this useless "solution" to their problem, but the problem, which was created by capitalism, isn't going anywhere until capitalism has sold us a "solution" for it. Just like they're trying to do with this sun blocking and carbon capturing bullshit now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In capitalism, if you don't work, some capitalist pig will throw your family out on the streets, whereas in communism, if you don't work, some communist pig will throw your family in jail.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that's why extremes will never work. Look every complex problem need a complex solucion.

We would need hybrids of all past rulling systems in order to actually improve.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even my country is "mixed" economy and still does not work well but i think its better than 100%capitalism or communism. Imo its still not that good because its not roperly configured

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enthanu bro modayano. Jai shree ram bolo bsdk Jai modiji

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›