this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
66 points (97.1% liked)

UK Politics

2985 readers
47 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obviously innocent until proven guilty, but isn't this the guy who claimed that the conviction of Imran Ahmad Khan for being a paedo was a "miscarriage of justice"?

It wouldn't surprise me if he'd also behaved in a similar fashion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At some point you start to wonder whether our abysmal rape conviction rates are a deliberate government policy to protect Conservative MPs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The policy doesn't matter as the police selectively enforce it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

And the police don't investigate historic crimes based on who the suspects are.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Just to preempt the “he should be in prison” comments, as this is a police inquiry he will not be required to resign unless he is found guilty and sentenced to more than a year in prison, and has run out of appeals.

Of course there is nothing stopping the Conservative Party from withdrawing the whip if they feel he is distracting from their work, but even then he can sit as an independent MP until he resigns, or the next election.

Innocent until proven guilty does apply even to politicians you don’t like.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He's standing down at the next election anyway, I believe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, at least that’s what he said when he was defending another sexual abuser https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/02/conservative-mp-crispin-blunt-to-step-down-at-next-election

I wonder if he was already under investigation at that point? It’s only five months ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not a uk citizen here. Am I understanding this correctly that even if he is found guilty of rape, but is not sentenced to more than a year of prison, and/or has the ability to object to his sentence, he can remain in office? What the fuck.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The rule of a 12 month sentence before a recall petition can be triggered is regardless of crime, it’s not a specific “get away with rape” clause. In fact if he is found guilty it’s very unlikely he’d get such a short sentence, the 12 months is more to stop an MP losing their job over not paying their council tax, or too many speeding tickets.

The big problem is our rape conviction rates are a shameful embarrassment so by the stats of it, if he did commit the crime he’s incredibly unlikely to be sentenced. And even if he was, it’s unlikely to be before there’s a general election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

the 12 months is more to stop an MP losing their job over not paying their council tax, or too many speeding tickets

To me that's pretty bonkers. Twelve months is 20% of a full parliamentary term! It should be set at any non suspended custodial sentence. How can an MP represent their constituency from a prison cell? Are they going to hold surgeries in the visiting room?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes Tory rhyming slang is, allegedly, spot on.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Between Blunt, Bone and Pincher I’m beginning to think we live in a simulation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Or a lost episode of The New Statesman which was canned because it was too outlandish to be believable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

At what point do the Tory party just recognise that their government is a complete and utter flustercluck and just call an election in the best interests of the country.

I mean, obviously never, but, it just gets more and more ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Sky News now reporting that the whip has been suspended, so it looks like the Tories aren’t standing by him and hoping it blows over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ex-Tory MP Crispin Blunt has confirmed that he was arrested on Wednesday in connection with an allegation of rape.

In a statement, the Reigate MP, who had the whip suspended on Thursday, said he had twice been interviewed by police "in connection with this incident".

The Conservative Party withdrew the whip from Mr Blunt, meaning he will sit as an independent MP, after he confirmed he had been arrested.

In a statement Mr Blunt, a former justice minister, said: "It has been reported that an MP was arrested yesterday [25 October] in connection with an allegation of rape.

The arrest was unnecessary as I remain ready to cooperate fully with the investigation that I am confident will end without charge.

The MP in his 50s is currently on bail until mid-February 2024 on allegations of sexual assault, abuse of position of trust and misconduct in a public office.


The original article contains 304 words, the summary contains 148 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!