this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
253 points (97.7% liked)

Privacy

32442 readers
715 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seen in Meta's new Twitter competitor

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

possibly never going to happen

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The last two for fuck sake; after that list what the hell is, or how does Fuckerburg, define 'sensitive data'?

'People' won't react to this until they are hit with a real and tangible consequence:

'sorry, based on the heath data you gave to Meta we're doubling your insurance premiums'

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

"Looking at your poor health choices and sports selection, sorry, we can't"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

People never read, just click the accept button.

Everyone knows it, it was even on S06E01 of Black Mirror.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're probably right, but why in the heck does instagram need health and fitness data? That really should set off alarm bells to any of the saps downloading that thing...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's a social network. Some people do post things related to health and fitness, and it's another gold mine of private data for ad targeting, so from a business perspective it makes sense to have features that integrate Instagram with these health and fitness gadgets.

This list is a summary of the data they may collect. Using these apps don't mean you're handing all this info automatically. Most of these are actually voluntarily shared e.g. when the user connects a fitness app to it; or actively requested e.g. when they make use of location sharing in the in-app chat.

The more in-app functionality a user makes use of, the more data they'll hoard about that user.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for clarifying!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unless there's a massive data breach which affects them personally - though not sure how that would be.

The only way to go may be forcing the mega-terch companies to respect user rights, which you'd think would be a joke - and for google/facebook/microsoft that is a joke, though it is interesting that apple introduced that "opt in app do-not-track" thing last year, where facebook shat it's pants.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The only time I saw a data breach changing user behavior was with LastPass scandal last year. Unless it's literally the people's bank account passwords that's at stake, I don't think most would care at all.

I agree, regulation - either enforced by the platform or authorities - may as well be the only way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The sad part is that option probably gives some people the impression like “oh Facebook can’t track me now”. Even though they were pretty annoyed by it I’m sure, they are one of a handful of companies that absolutely does not need your device’s tracking token to still track you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Facebook have got data breach a few times which didn't stop majority of people still using it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll stay away for any social media Facebook will create

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People literally don't care about their privacy. Anything that is raised regarding tracking is classified as being paranoid and you become a weirdo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless it's blamed on a foreign country. Then it's "why aren't we nuking them?!?!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People in America love to complain about TikTok is harvesting all sorts of data. My response is yeah that’s awful, let’s stop all the data harvesting, and they’re like no just TikTok, the CCP is the ultimate evil

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that's what they are told to think. The notion that they are thinking on their own is laughable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah definitely. The media loves to paint China as some massive villain and the American tech companies as our saviours, while they’re both doing similar evil shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

All govs want to protect or further their personal interests: Monopolies of violence, power, and intelligence. The citizens be damned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In fairness, privacy issues have been a bit like a "frog in boiling water". Unless you pay a lot of attention to these things or are completely out of the loop, the average person won't see the issue.

At least my grandmother's vindicated now for not wanting to get on Facebook and share those sorts of things

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not until there is a massive data breach that leads to very serious and obvious real world consequences

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like the Equifax hack that nobody cares about anymore?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a similar scale, but with consequences like zeroing out savings and maxing out credit cards of several dozens of millions of people or violence for political views/sexual preferences/etc on the same scale. Basically, something that will make a large number of people learn about the importance of privacy the hard way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it’s violence over sexual preferences I imagine a lot of people will be indifferent or blame deviants as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

"I have nothing to hide"
People just want to use the app, like on TikTok "China is spying you, it will be blocked" many started to looking for VPNs to unblock the app.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

my dad barely understands how email works, do you think he even knows what all of these do lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel very lucky that my mom knows a lot, changes passwords for my dad, and had no problem moving away with me to Signal and we can complain together about website that don't allow you to refuse cookies

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Honestly I hope Threads is successful enough to kill off Twitter so that we can move one step closer to Musk fading into obscurity.

[–] Acheron 8 points 1 year ago

Women I knew started to care when I showed them articles about how google and meta knew their menstrual cycles, and reported on searches about abortions to law emfprcemt

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Until there's a massive leak of credit card data from a single incident, nothing will change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think even that is enough - people will just have their banks sort it all out. I think only stuff like identity theft as a result of a breach will make people learn IMO

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, banks don't sort it out very fast and they definitely won't solve it fast if it happens to a large percentage of their clients.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People don't care. They will never care.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They will once it hurts their wallets.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This the dystopia we chose for ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm an average Joe and try to minimize my digital footprint as much as convenience allows, but keep seeing people say that this is paranoia and doesn't matter.

[–] darcy 2 points 1 year ago

it does matter. its not necesserily about not wanting my own data collected, its about everyones being collected, and big tech controlling our whole lives

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Oh, look! They are going to track all my purchases and sell to third parties! HAHA ! Who is gonna want to buy info out of a random loser buying coffee?"

- Unironically me, 13'ish years ago

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Never.

Just look at what happens on Reddit when Mastodon is brought up in the Threads/Twitter wars.

“Ohhhh it’s too haaaaard to use. What does it matter about a little privacy loss anyway?”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

We (i.e. those of us who work in the industry and care about such things) really need to work on messaging to get through to normal people.

For instance, people are genuinely freaked out at the idea of Facebook listening to them through their phones. It really hits a nerve. Now that isn't happening, but what is happening is even worse. Facebook are able to predict your behaviour, your thoughts, so well that it gives the illusion that they're listening to you. They've spent decades training their models on your behaviour, your content, both on their website and across the entire web and beyond. And they've fucking nailed it.

That's far far more scary than them listening to you. They know things about you that you don't even say out loud. It's terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Consumerist pigs don't care about literally anything past their own consumption and comforts.