1073
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Always a smokescreen to take away your rights. Epstein plead guilty in 2008 to trafficking children to nobody.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 97 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Pro tip: The Electronic Frontier Foundation is a non-profit which has been defending your right to privacy for many years. If you shop on Amazon, you can give a portion of the purchase price to EFF. You pay the same amount and daddy bezos gets a few less dollars. Use the affiliate link, not the smile link as smile has been sunsetted: https://www.eff.org/node/58741

[-] [email protected] 100 points 9 months ago

Propro tip: Don’t buy from evilcorp and donate those savings directly to the EFF

[-] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago

Agreed. Some people have to shop there for whatever reason. If that's you, the link is good to use :).

[-] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

Amazon Smile is discontinued fyi

[-] insomniac 14 points 9 months ago

There’s so much irony in this comment it cured my anemia

[-] Mnemnosyne 80 points 9 months ago

Anything and everything that politicians propose to protect children, I am automatically against. It doesn't matter how good it sounds, if they say anything about protecting children, I'm opposed to it.

This is because they know that 'protect children' are magic words that let them get away with almost anything, and that's genuinely about the only time they say that anyway. Basically nothing the government does is actually to protect children.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

We had a recreational marijuana referendum in my state and the opposition signs said, "Save the Children." From what? I have no idea. Unsurprisingly, the vote failed.

Of course, it really helped that the state legislature sued to halt the referendum on grounds of improper procedure which caused the referendum to be put on the ballot as a special election instead of the mid-terms ballot. The judge dismissed the lawsuit, by the way.

The shit some people will do to stop other people from having a good time.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

God, that's totally depressing, and I totally agree with you.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

US keeps taking the flame while EU, Bastion of Rightsâ„¢, just outright banning encryption.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago

Different departments. It's the 'keep the plebs in line department' that wants to scan your devices.
Where as the 'keep the rich giving us money department' are not actioning the rapist list

Wish I could add a /s to this.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

They're the same department.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Why would they be? To save taxpayers' money?

[-] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago

Government:

Star Wars "Of course I know him, he is me."

[-] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

Maybe if 30% of the population weren't trying to re-elect one of those people for president it would be easier.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

It's so adorable how many Americans think that the oligarchs they support are different.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

LMAO imagine being an apologist for pedophilia and human trafficking and then judging others.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Or Maxwell's client list...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I'm out of the loop, what's this?

[-] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

The gal that recruited and ran girls under Epstein's racket had a book of clients that turned up in evidence, and naturally the government isn't going after a single one of them because they're "special" aka rich and powerful

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

What the hell would stop the government from just putting CSAM onto the phones of political rivals and upstarts to get them jailed without question?

And child molesters will run away scot-free on account of all this.

Isn't there anyone who will stop the dirty child molesters without wanting power in return? Anyone?

Anyone who will stop the government?

Anybody?

[-] praise_idleness 3 points 9 months ago

Remember: There is no safe backdoor. There is no "only for pedos and terrorists". It's private or not. Simple as that.

[-] Meowoem 1 points 9 months ago

Hey we're only going to ban perverted and dangerous stuff, do you really want to protect that? What will people think if you're trying to protect people like that?

Great! Good to have you on board, give me a second to delete all the perverted websites that don't have strong enough moderation, yes that's anyone who doesn't use our government sanctioned AI moderator... And I'm getting rid of all the terrorist stuff, those awful people trying to recruit people into their gangs so they can get what they want by using threats - like unions and anyone protesting me....

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
1073 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

44230 readers
1623 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS