this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
44 points (79.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7063 readers
586 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (5 children)

There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So they're using the parliamentarian defense again eh? I didn't buy it then and it won't fly now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, instead it would be a good idea for Biden to give Congress an ACTUAL reason to impeach him, ensuring that either Cheeto Mussolini or Little Rhonda show up and install a fascist state.

It’s 20 miles of a 2000-mile border. I’ll take “keep defeat of the impending fascist takeover on the table” over “concrete case for impeaching Sleepy Joe”

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

you actually think ad hominem counts as a debate tactic? Swing and a miss.

Ill make it easy for you. You make a salient point. Anything with a link showing the class you actually have looked into this and are better than some drunk raving in a bar.

I can't wait to see you ignore my instructions, show your ass, and give me a greater sense of superiority than you have already provided me today.

Go

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Cheeto Mussolini

Wild wine cave liberal appeared! maybe-later-honey

It’s 20 miles of a 2000-mile border.

Wild wine cave liberal used diluted atrocity rationalization! morshupls

It's not very effective.

I’ll take “keep defeat of the impending fascist takeover on the table” over “concrete case for impeaching Sleepy Joe”

Wild wine cave liberal used West Wing appeasement logic! bootlicker

It's not very effective.

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

Wild wine cave liberal used smug condescension! smuglord

It's not very effective.

Wild wine cave liberal fainted from huffing their own farts! blob-sleep

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

i'm sure you feel that way. after all, we'd never build your racist fucking wall, you piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah Congress didn't tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall's completion wouldn't do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

This is a lie, plain and simple.

[–] halvo317 6 points 10 months ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Yes you're recognizing the liberal urge to defend fascist behavior

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it.

[–] fsxylo 2 points 10 months ago

Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage.

I hate the algorithm.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

His hands are mostly tied here

doubt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

hahahahahahaha "the man in charge of the country and the political party in power have no say! they have to do the incredibly evil thing! the money couldn't just sit there and not get used, that would be a worse sin than putting up barbed wire and machine gun nests"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Looks like my next vote will be tied to a brick.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is getting reposted everywhere even though people in the comments are constantly giving the correct information on why this happened. Just giving you a heads-up so you're not to quick to tie your vote to someone else's willful misunderstanding of the separation of powers.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So who is forcing him to waive laws? What will happen if he doesn't?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

All these questions and more can be answered with a simple web search.