this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
44 points (79.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7063 readers
571 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah Congress didn't tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall's completion wouldn't do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

This is a lie, plain and simple.

[–] halvo317 6 points 10 months ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Yes you're recognizing the liberal urge to defend fascist behavior

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it.