A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Weird to see an entire nation so committed to openly being morally clear cut baddies while hardly even trying to spin it.
I'm used to nations being evil. I'm not used to them slyly winking when you point it out.
Russia is more of a middle finger over the shoulder as they face away from you kind of villain.
The article clearly says they intended to blame Ukraine for it tho?
That’s sounds like the opposite of open.
Yeah well. We have announced their plans in advance before and they still did it all according to plan, no real change.
Before he was president, Biden is on record saying he once met Putin. In a private exchange he said to Putin "I don't think you have a soul", to which Putin merely replied "We understand one another." I've never forgotten that.
Lol, this would mean they'd have to leave port something they're not happy doing currently as Ukraine will make some lovely reefs if they do
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Based on what it said was declassified intelligence, the UK said Russia did not want to directly attack merchant ships using Ukraine’s newly created humanitarian corridor with missiles, but instead try to destroy them covertly.
Russia would then seek to blame Ukraine for the loss of any shipping in an attempt to evade responsibility, the British Foreign Office continued, and the UK said it was going public in order to deter Moscow from carrying out the plan.
James Cleverly, the UK foreign secretary, accused Russia of the “pernicious targeting” of civilian shipping: “The world is watching – and we see right through Russia’s cynical attempts to lay blame on Ukraine for their attacks.”
Kyiv created an alternative humanitarian corridor in August, in which ships travel inside the territorial waters of Turkey, Bulgaria and Romania, before passing close to Ukraine, where they are at risk of Russian attack.
Britain said it wanted to work with Ukraine and others to improve the safety of merchant shipping, using intelligence and surveillance capabilities, although it acknowledges the threat from Russia remains “at the highest level”.
Last month, the UK said Russia had, in August, fired two Kalibr cruise missiles at a Libyan-flagged tanker in Odesa.
The original article contains 407 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Damn if only there was a NATO country who could control that sea. Oh wait. It's those fat fucks who still dream of the rise of a new ottoman empire who now live off harbouring criminals and terrorists.