this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
109 points (96.6% liked)

World News

38278 readers
2484 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Asking prospective students for their skin color when they apply to your school should be unthinkable.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I want to attend your school just like my grandfather" = This is fine

"I want to attend your school because my grandfather wasn't allowed to" = This is not

Think about that for a second.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legacy admissions shouldn't be a thing either, imo. It should be 100% about merit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Absolutely.

And until that's the case, there's a clear double standard that benefits white people.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait is this actually a thing?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Legacy is a much more weighted merit than affirmative action was.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, mostly for the super prestigious universities though. I don't know anyone who was a legacy admissions to their school, but then again I don't know anyone who went to ivy league.

It's stupid, and it benefits certain rich, mostly white families who could afford those types of schools for generations. It needs to end as well.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, asking anyone for race on any application for anything shouldn't be a thing. With the exception of medical things specific to race, it's completely unnecessary. Unless I'm missing something glaring, other than perpetuating systematic disenfranchisement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's a way for the college admissions to combat the systemic racism already present in USA society. It treats a symptom of a larger issue. A college cannot help with all the disadvantages minority students face throughout thier primary education but they can account for that in admissions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (18 children)

But asking them who their father is is fine?

If people gave a shit about fairness they'd care about legacy admission more than affirmative action.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, that's not fine either and should also be outlawed due to a history of systemic racism giving some people an advantage over others.

It should be 100% merit based, plain and simple. It's the only fair way.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Funny how we addressed the tool that helped black kids first, rather than the one that hurt them.

Maybe it's because this is being pushed by bad people, that you seem to agree with under some fantasy of "100% merit based" reality.

Systemic biases exist, AA compensated for them banking AA is basically pretending this nation isn't racist AF.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This is honestly great to hear. I have heard calls for this for years, and have repeatedly seen stats that show how Affirmative Action can end up hurting lots of people's chances at acceptance to universities. See: https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/med1.jpg?x91208

I just wish that, based on their recent track record, I knew that the Supreme Court had passed this ruling with good intentions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's such a small weight in the overall judgement (according to the selection metrics published by universities) that I'm doubtful much will change. And another dog whistle becomes obsolete for the right wing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If it was so irrelevant, the colleges would not have fought tooth and nail to maintain it. Anyway, the prior experience of individual states that have banned affirmative action indicates that the effects are not negligible -- it's responsible for double digit shifts in racial compositions of student bodies.

Things will depend on how the universities respond; one can imagine Harvard doubling down on ever-subtler ways to tag Asians as personality-free robots undeserving of consideration.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Exactly, can't solve discrimination with more discrimination.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Questionable. In Northern Ireland, the police used to be something like 7% Catholic, policing a population that was over 40% Catholic. It was controversial at the time, but a 50:50 recruitment policy was put in place in the mid to late 90s, until the balance of the police force matched the wider community.

This is now very broadly accepted as a necessary and beneficial move. The current police force is generally seen as impartial (in terms of this one issue) while the old one was generally not trusted by the minority, to put it mildly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's a good example

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of things that US courts have recently done(this included) is making making me wonder about how judicial review should work. Because what I keep seeing is that US courts will strike down shitty band aid solutions(which AA was, it was an attempt at a quick and easy solution for a very long list of social issues) without offering better alternatives. I do think that affirmative action should not have to exist, but the better choice is full scale education reform, addressing systemic racism, an understanding of how privilege affects educational outcomes, and greater availability and lower cost of the highest quality tertiary education. As it is today I am observing courts not choosing perfect over good, but rather destroying half baked solutions because they oppose the intended outcomes of those solutions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The elite are at it again. Got to keep them colored folks down.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't this impact admissions for international students too?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›