Science

Go home headline, you're drunk.

Maybe they should focus on the carbon footprint of large companies and what they can do about it instead of constantly doing these studies that constantly demean us for trying to just live.

I mean, obviously this does matter, but given that the 1% are the ones causing as much pollution as the combined poorest 50% of the world, I feel like we need to ground bizjets a lot more than we need to noodle over whether or not office work causes more pollution than remote work.

remote workers often drive more often than their in-office counterparts by taking several short car trips throughout the day.

The researchers also found that working from home can prompt people to use more energy over the course of a workday

Biking to a nearby coffee shop with your laptop, for example, is an extremely carbon-efficient way to work.

The study’s authors also point out that office buildings can be made greener. If older buildings were revamped with more energy-efficient appliances and put on a decarbonized grid, then in-office work could match the greenhouse gas emissions of working from home. Taking public transit can also contribute significantly to reducing an individual’s carbon footprint, even if they are working from an office.

So yes, your commute can make up more than half of your footprint, IF you otherwise avoid any and all big emitters in your life.

If you eat meat, use air travel or cruise ships, own a car or another fossil fueled vehicle, have a big home (which may not feel big for you), have kids, waste food, then your footprint will be affected much less by wether you work from home or commute.

Obligatory disclaimer: The climate crisis is a systemic crisis and cannot be solved on the individual level. Vote, voice, organize, disrupt.

Link that to ESG lol

Four or more days a week? Are people expected to work more than 5 days a week in an office job?