this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43760 readers
1165 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

...

  • cries in unemployed *
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

124,594 hours (14 years) would be enough to retire right now, anything less than that wouldn't be immediately "life changing" since I'd still have to hold down a job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mean the income of 14 years, or the income you would get working 14 while years (which with a 40hour work week is more like 60 years of work)?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I took the amount I estimate I would need to retire right now at my current age and divided that by my current hourly rate. So it's 124,594 working "man-hours", as you say like 60 years of working. But that value goes down every year I do actually work and as my retirement investments grow.

I assume OP asked it that way to normalize and anonymize it a little.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well good luck reaching that goal. However 60 years of work seems way to high.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Lots of student loans and no money saved, so unless it's enough money to pay off all the student loans, buy a house, and have a self sustaining retirement fund, my life wouldn't change today. Any amount would certainly help in the future, but if it doesn't reach all those goals, I'll still have to a similar day-to-day for the time being.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

$500 would get all my bills caught back up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I’m turning 36 this year and it’s already happened in a way. In 2019 I was making $14 an hour working at a head shop, and now I’m making just shy of $100k and it finally feels like I can take care of myself (barely)

If you live in any major metro area, I really feel like you can’t break the true comfort level unless your household income is $200k. $100k just doesn’t cut it anymore if you want to own a decent house, pay crazy prices for healthcare, have saving/retirement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Two-three years, to quit job, buy materials and needed machinery, little cushion and make the same work I do for other people and make money for myself instead as others.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe a quarter of a million. Enough to retire in the third world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm probably going to need a year's worth of my time, in part because I would use that to take a year off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

24/7 for a decade would be dope.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

20 years. Mortgage + interest paid off. I'd still have to work of course, but to be mortgage free would be a game changer.

Including not needing to work, maybe another 20 years on top of that.

Kinda depressing huh

[–] Sinnamon 2 points 1 year ago

Two years worth would be enough down payment for the mortgage on a nice, non-starter home in my area affordable. Anything less would just go towards that future goal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Depends how life changing we're talking. $1k could do up my garden and furnish my house. $10k would mean I wouldn't need to worry about mortgage repayments for a year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As of now, 2 years would be enough. I would have enough money to get out of my parents house without them giving me money for a year so that I could study without working before I (hopefully) get my scholarship next year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm impressed that would be only a year. I have so many debt I thought it would be 3 to 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Anything more than $30 000 I guess

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think money would change my life. I make enough to pay my bills and eat. I have plenty of friends, and that doesn't cost money.

[–] r_ffer23 1 points 1 year ago

2 years. That would be enough to pay debts and try a different lifestyle in another city.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm in my mid 40s, married with three kids (teenagers and one in his twenties) and we're right in the middle of middle class.

$100K I could pay off both our cars, and put a nice down payment on a house and enjoy a lower cost mortgage.

$500K I could buy and furnish a house, no more rent or mortgage (but still taxes, which are pretty reasonable where I live).

$1 Million same, but a nice nest egg for the future and help my kids get set up.

$2 Million or more I could seriously consider retirement.

$5 Million or more, I'm definitely retiring.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

1 year of salary extra would be unbelievably life-changing. Like.....every single stress in life would be eliminated. Shoot, even $10k extra would be HUGELY beneficial.

Been thinking about starting to drive Door dash or another side gig to supplement income.