this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
173 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18672 readers
2747 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
173
Florida leaders silent after senator confronts staffer at women’s shelter (www.orlandosentinel.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Article really makes Tom Wright seem like a psycho piece of shit. Screaming at and placing hands on the staffers of the battered women's shelter in front of the bus full of battered women. He was issued a trespass warning by the police and told to stay away.

He's also stopping people from funding the shelter with evidenceless accusations of human trafficking. What a low down bastard, should have his kneecaps broken by a gang of battered women.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Article really makes Tom Wright seem like a psycho piece of shit.

I'd argue that Tom Wight does that all by himself without the article.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Certainly a fair interpretation of the report

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Article really makes Tom Wright seem like a psycho piece of shit.

Exactly. He comes off as the sort of guy the shelter was designed to protect women from.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Tom Wright needs to be investigated for the same claims he makes. He clearly has problems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if this guy is full-on "red-pilled," believing that the trafficking also involves satanic rituals. This guy sounds unhinged and possibly dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

TALLAHASSEE — Senate leaders have been silent about an angry confrontation between Republican Sen. Tom Wright and a female staffer at a Daytona Beach shelter for battered and abused women and their children over the Labor Day weekend.

According to police reports, Wright yelled, lunged at, and placed his hand on the shoulder of a staff member who stopped Wright from getting on a bus full of the shelter’s residents out of concern for protecting their identities.

Why? Just why? The fuck is his end game?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Reactionaries gonna react.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Speculation: someone he knows is in that or a similar shelter, and he's melting down because she's out of his control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

As much violence as they can get away with against everyone against whom they can get away with it is the American conservative end game.

[–] spacecowboy 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wright could be admonished, censured or even removed from office if the investigation concludes he did something illegal.

*emphasis mine

What happened to the days where someone who acted unprofessional or out of line in a position of public service was removed or had the god damn decency to resign in shame?

You’re supposed to be representing people. You’re supposed to follow an ethical code.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Conservatives, especially Florida conservatives, are absolutely following their ethical code.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but this is Florida ...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Be interesting if, instead of commenting here, it was more common to just look up the phone number of a public servant, call their office, and express ones concern for the mental health of the senator. One may end up speaking with a member of the senators staff, but it sure seems more meaningful than commenting here, especially if one is able to remain civil while doing so. Might mean something to a person who actually works with the senator if people were to demonstrate proper human behavior in contrast to horrible actions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of rep offices are automated now bc plenty of people do call. And when they do answer, it's a staffer who only offers boilerplate responses. What I'm saying is that calling them isn't anymore meaningful in the majority of cases than commenting online. Now, going to that rep's office in person... that's much harder for them to ignore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I live across the country from Florida senator Anger-issues. Having a conversation in the phone with someone who even works in his office is way better than doing nothing. I am saying that it might be good to connect on a human level to express concern. You do you, though. Tell me how it goes visiting his office?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Ha, that's a great joke, what's the next one?

[–] copymyjalopy 7 points 11 months ago

These are the actions of a monied, powerful predator that got stood up to by a woman. This is spite and misogyny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I look forward to his mugshot.