this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
401 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

34388 readers
245 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I liked chrome because it was quick and had useful features. Past tense. C-ya.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox has been as fast as chrome on most websites for some years now. Chrome was quick a decade ago, not anymore...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man I wish we hadn’t all fallen for the “don’t be evil” motto all those years ago.

This move from Google is utter, utter bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well they did remove the don’t be evil motto… guess it didn’t fit their business model

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spoiler: it fits very few company's business models. Some companies can avoid it, if their owners/board want to. But once they take venture capital, or go public, they lose that choice. And that "don't be evil" promise, and most any other, is void.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

once they go public, the only goal is MOAR MONEY! reddit will also fall into this trap when/if they go public.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shareholders can actually sue a business for making ethical decisions that leave money on the table.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People can sue for anything, doesn't mean they'll win

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy 2 points 1 year ago

Not too long ago I personally discovered their own AI had some interesting insight about this topic... https://sh.itjust.works/post/1176461

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

We all did. It's very much possible that they really meant it at the time. Most companies start with a lot of idealism. And then they become successful and consequently the target of cronies. They feel like they're entitled to everyone else's earnings and the dark pattern begins.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this the part where I act surprised?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I avoided chrome for a long time. Finally I made the switch because FF was getting too slow on old computers back in the day. Lasted for maybe five or six years before I started getting some bad vibes. Why am I letting google run the web browsing software I'm using? This can't/won't be good in the future.

At least five years ago I made the switch back to Firefox, and haven't looked back. I love having adblocking that works (I use a router level ad block and ublock origin just in case to ensure I block almost every ad on the internet lol).

I'm honestly surprised it took people this long to decide to move away from Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Firefox really became awesome after the quantum update. It really is the best browser to date imo.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed.

My personal browser history:

  1. IE - came with Windows, before I didn't really know what a browser was; we also had Mozilla, but only my dad used it
  2. Firefox - as a teenager, I think I started at 1.5 and used until 3.5 or so
  3. Chrome - it was faster than Firefox, so I used and recommended it to a lot of people; this is also when I started to care about web standards (tried to get IE users to use Chrome)
  4. Opera - used for a couple years until they announced 15, which was going to be Chrome based
  5. Firefox - I used Firefox off and on throughout, and remember the switch to rapid releases, and I've used it nearly exclusively (aside from Web Dev testing) since 2013 or so

Once Opera switched to Chrome-based, I started heavily recommending Firefox. So I saw the writing on the wall about 10 years ago, and now I'm stubborn about avoiding Chrome where possible. I hope others choose to switch too.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but this is Google, and they control Chrome, and this probably still won't make people switch to Firefox

Yeah. People just simply will not do things that are in their best interest. This is literally the biggest issue that was had with IE. Inertia.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All of my web interaction at this point happens through my Android phone, Google has me by the balls anyway.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There is Firefox for Android. You're still on Android, but you can have some control left.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately Firefox doesn't have a replacement for the "Android System WebView" component, so any app that embeds a browser component (and oh boy is that a lot of them) will still be using Chrome.

There's a relevant ticket here: https://github.com/mozilla/geckoview/issues/167

It should be possible to have a shim that allows Mozilla's "GeckoView" component to implement the API, but - per that ticket, at least - most Android ROMs won't allow alternatives to the Google one.

The Firefox browser is genuinely great, but it's so far from possible to replace Chrome with it everywhere a browser is used.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't uninstall Chrome most likely, but maybe your stock/rom will allow you to "disable" it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good idea. Let me disable it and see what breaks! ( i have firefox and inbrowser installed on lineageos )

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Also Firefox Focus, which forgets your browsing history when you close it or hit the trashcan button.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Google has me by the balls anyway.

GrapheneOS? Are you on a Pixel?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lineageos+microg is a useable de-googled android. I'm using it now without any google services.

[–] TacoButtPlug 19 points 1 year ago

So they're baking user behavior tracking into the browser but calling it "privacy"? What's the difference between this and colors cookie tracking?

[–] kakes 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They say this is meant to be an eventual replacement for tracking via cookies, but there is literally no way this won't become supplemental to current tracking methods. And I think they know that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

While I don't agree with what Google does, they want to remove third-party cookies entirely next year. So it's indeed a replacement, not supplemental.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Unlike the glitzy front-page Google blog post that the redesign got, the big ad platform launch announcement is tucked away on the privacysandbox.com page.

The blog post says the ad platform is hitting "general availability" today, meaning it has rolled out to most Chrome users.

This has been a long time coming, with the APIs rolling out about a month ago and a million incremental steps in the beta and dev builds, but now the deed is finally done.

Users should see a pop-up when they start up Chrome soon, informing them that an "ad privacy" feature has been rolled out to them and enabled.

That's actually what started this whole process: Apple dealt a giant blow to Google's core revenue stream when it blocked third-party cookies in Safari in 2020.

Google says it will block third-party cookies in the second half of 2024—presumably after it makes sure the "Privacy Sandbox" will allow it to keep its profits up.


The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna be hilarious when we hear about it lowering productivity at work.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gonna be hilarious when hackers figure out how to hijack where this reports back to. Particularly since Google recently got rid of most of their senior devs you know, the ones who can actually make secure code.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The Federated Learning of Cohorts and now the Topics API are part of a plan to pitch an "alternative" tracking platform, and Google argues that there has to be a tracking alternative—you can't just not be spied on.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Librewolf!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any news on when this hits chromium?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

probably already has. They put things into chromium first, then move them to chrome usually.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And then hoodwink people into upgrading with the promise of Material You themes 🙄

I hope Chromium-based Vivaldi is still okay. I'm pretty invested in some of its features (though I have to admit it is getting more bloaty).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Duplicate (on the same community 2 hours before)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›