this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
218 points (97.8% liked)

politics

24428 readers
2323 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Black men like myself have a fix for this. It’s expensive, but what’s daddy Trump gonna do? Sanction Germany?

The Braun 8 series is the $300 dollar fuck you to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago

1000% Tariff on all Braun shavers in 3...2..

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Who wants to be part of this military anyway? You're just waiting to attack California or defend genocidal regimes.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Back in basic, almost every black person in my division got what was called a "shave chit" which was basically just a piece of paper saying "this recruit doesn't have to shave every morning for medical reasons"

And having seen them try in the first week or so to shave with everyone else, yeah. Fuck shaving every day anyway, but why would you purposely force someone to essentially slice their face off little by little wherever hair grows???

[–] muusemuuse 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It’s the military. If you can’t comply to every dumb standard you shouldn’t be there. Thats how they see this.

Seriously though, cheese out all those qualified military personnel. It frees them up to form militias to resist your bullshit later.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadism and racism. I can think of no other reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

MAGA policy at its finest. Ironically if this policy successfully discourages blacks from enlisting in the military, it might be a liberation of sorts for them.

[–] ricecake 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of sorts indeed. For a lot of people the military is the only option we give as a way out of difficult circumstances, and the educational grants and such are potentially their only way see a better future.
It's rough but it's unfortunately the best path our society has seen fit to build.
God forbid we invest in underserved communities or provide general education grants.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean this is why I served. I knew I didn't have a home once I turned 18. No one in my family or extended family had been to college. Poor kid from a shitty school, I had no idea how to make it happen. So before I turned 18 I emancipated and shipped out. What I found was one of the most diverse workforce in the US, because its comprised of almost exclusively poor people from all across the US.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the whiter the military is, the easier it will be to use them to suppress protests against ICE.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

I think that’s the goal, to make a loyal military.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of sorts. Some of them joined the military because they faced discrimination in hiring for civilian jobs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder how that would affect any possible signing bonuses the soldiers got when they signed up. Are they going to have to pay any money back? Are they going to have access to their GI Bill?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Not an expert, but it could depend on whether it's considered a dishonorable discharge or not. Common sense would say no, this should be something akin to a medical discharge, but given everything that's going on I wouldn't bet on that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm white AF and this happens to me. It sucks. Of course my beard hair is the shape of black hair and the texture of hog bristles so it's not really surprising.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Best thing I've done for it is to use a single blade (safety razor) and shave exclusively in the shower. The steam opens your pours and helps reduce irritation.

Also, shaving "with" the grain. Which is easier said then done since it kinda goes every direction.

But the biggest difference has been shaving in the shower. My skin goes crazy otherwise.

I have a full beard so I avoid shaving most of it. I'm so hairy that I have to shave most of my neck and my upper cheeks though otherwise I'd look like a Yeti. Seriously, some hairs are nearly to my eyes.

My genes are apparently just pure European (almost a flat mix from Ireland to Ukraine). But my hair is extremely curly even on my head. My friends use to say I had a "jew-fro" but I'm not Jewish from what a DNA test said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There's no directionality to my hair growth whatsoever. So no matter which way I'm shaving I'm going against the grain. I blame the 1/64 Papuan DNA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Yeah. That's how my neck is for some reason. And it's the part I have to shave unless I wanna look like a Yeti.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Also, shaving "with" the grain. Which is easier said then done since it kinda goes every direction.

So, as per the second of two fragments, I should SAY I'm shaving with the grain before I do it for best results. It's weird, but I'll try it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shaving in the shower is godsent advice

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It really was a game changer. A hot towel can help in a pinch. But it's definitely the continuous hot steam that really helps.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Irish / Celtic population is known for being curly too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Must be it. My wife's east asian with super straight hair. Our daughter was born with a full head of curly hair. It must be very dominant.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Forcing people out of the military for a policy that wasn't around when they joined gives the service member some leeway. There's usually a period of voluntary separation where they can opt in to receive a severance pay and streamline the process. If the service member doesn't opt for voluntary separation, they are involuntarily separated. This involves a little more paperwork, a longer process, and half the severance pay of a voluntary separation. In both cases it's an honorable discharge (unless there's something else criminal at play) and they keep all benefits and entitlements.

I'm more familiar with Navy regulations, but here's an example from the DEI rollback from March (TW for the shitty title of the message).

Trigger warningInitial Direction on Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness

Paragraph 5 stipulates the terms of voluntary separation. More specifically:

b. Any remaining military service obligation will be waived for members requesting voluntary separation; any bonus received prior to 26 February 2025 and subject to a service obligation will not be recouped. Absent any other basis for separation or disenrollment, USNA and NROTC midshipmen will not be subject to monetary repayment of education benefits.

d. Characterization of service will be honorable except where the member's record otherwise warrants a different characterization. The applicable separation program designator codes and associated narrative reasons for separation will be provided at a later date by an appropriate official of the Office of the ASN(M&RA) in coordination with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.

e. For military personnel requesting voluntary separation and eligible for voluntary separation pay in accordance with references (h) and (i), CNO and CMC will authorize voluntary separation pay at a rate that is twice the amount of involuntary separation pay for which the member would have been eligible in accordance with reference (j). Voluntary separation pay is not payable to those with less than six years or more than 20 years of service. No member receiving Voluntary Separation Pay in accordance with this ALNAV will be required to serve in the Ready Reserve.

f. CNO and CMC are authorized Temporary Early Retirement Authority for members with over 18 but less than 20 years of total active-duty service eligible per reference (k) and separated in accordance with this ALNAV.

If you have friends, family, or acquaintance who are US military members, please use this information and opportunity to educate, agitate, and organize. Some of these people are about to lose their stability and routine, and it's important to direct their frustration and blame at the racist policies of this administration, linking it to other intersectionalities, and building camaraderie.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Still the best take on this "freedom to join the military" debate after over 30 years.

https://youtu.be/BTFUI6kp8qQ