this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Positive News

163 readers
32 users here now

This community is intended to diffuse the good things that happening in the news. Since we value social justice and environement, some contents are prohibited:

-Gratuitous aggressivity.

-Off-topic.

-Schadenfreude.

-Good news from a capitalistic or reactionary viewpoint (no "anti-woke", AI or crypto BS).

-News that are too anecdotical, like everyday kindness or common positive events (they better fit in communities like Upliftingnews).

-News which goodness depends of your personal tastes, like the victory of your favorite soccer team or the release of a movie you were waiting for.

-Disguised bad news.

-Fake news.

-Orphan crushing machines.

-Good news not yet concretized, like political promises, petitions, protests, denounciations (though some exceptions are tolerated, like political defeat of an explicitely shady politician or a protest carrying a particularly large amount of people).

-Scientific discoveries that does not improve health, social justice or environment.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
all 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The rules, originally introduced to decrease the risk of blood donations from groups with a higher chance of HIV exposure

Hasn't it been super easy to test for HIV for ages now? If they truly cared, they would just test for it, with an extra bonus being that anyone donating blood who don't know they have HIV can actually find out and get treatment. They already test donors for blood type to avoid having people misreport their types. This seems like more of a revisionist excuse to cover up the original homophobic reasons for the ban, i.e. preventing "pure, straight, god fearing Christians from being contaminated with demonic gay blood" or something.