this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
658 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71585 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 minutes ago

Yo I pay for premium and it’s been fucking slow. Cancel my subscription? Guess I might need to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

Down with google

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

So it's wait a few seconds and watch a black screen or watch a minute of ads? What a choice...

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 hours ago

A wild YouTube appeared!

Go, uBlock Origin!

Wild YouTube used Throttle!

It's not very effective...

uBlock Origin used Evolve!

It's super effective!

YouTube fainted!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I watched videos on Newgrounds using dial-up

They are going to have to slow ad blockers by a lot for me to consider it slow

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

My wife and I were discussing this. This isnt "slow" to us, its just a tiny bit inconvenient. We were used to the old AOL pictures taking a good minute or two to load.

We would get rid of Youtube before we get ads.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Then I suppose it's a good thing they're limiting non-premium users from using the "high bitrate" quality options?

^ that was sarcasm. HARSH sarcasm. With both middle fingers pointing toward a Google logo and spitting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

That's a relief. I've been dreading the day when they introduce server-side adsm but it seems we're not there yet 😅 I'm not sure what they think they'll accomplish with this when it's A LOT less painful than turning off your adblocker and dealing with the ads, though. Maybe they're just trying random things to see what works.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

“Do evil.” Google’s official new slogan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

That's true but I wouldn't really classify this as evil.

Serving videos isn't easy or cheap. It's hard and expensive.

I obviously use an adblocker everywhere and so should you.

But saying that Google or anyone else is doing anything wrong by blocking adblockers is ridiculous. When they finally succeed, I will just accept that I finally lost after many many years. My usage of YouTube will likely go down substantially as well. Crying about it after you have used their service for free for YEARS, really makes no sense.

[–] xzot746 1 points 3 hours ago

Or "Might as well do EVIL", what is anybody going to do about it, maybe make some noise but we just pay off TACO and we good.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

God damn American companies love fucking up everything for money!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nestlé: I have done nothing wrong, ever, in my life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 minutes ago

OTOH, Danone is a B corporation, so there are choices in that space.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago

Been using revanced for months and haven't noticed a difference other than no ads or sponsors on bigger channels.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

I’m curious what people would prefer for revenue generation models. Just subscription fees? A lot of folks also seem resistant to that as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would happily pay for yt premium, if that also meant that google does not violate my privacy and sell my data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

That’s my problem, you have to be logged in if you pay and that’s just more data for them to suck up. I watch not logged in. If I want to comment I use a different device.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would prefer a model that does not demand infinite growth, leading to ever declining quality and services. I would prefer a tech site that’s satisfied bringing in a comfortable and steady flow of profit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

All decent people would. I meant within the bounds of treason and tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh, uh, pass.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What they had like 10 years ago a couple ads here and there. Not 5 minutes ad 5 minutes ad 5 minutes ad 5 minutess ad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Interesting. I didn’t think anyone was cool with any ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Direct sponsoring has worked in the past with many open source projects (including lemmy.world). Could be closer to what Patreon does.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh hey I ran into that issue, fixed it by blocking the element on ublock and spoofing my user agent

Edit: I put more details under nameisnotimportant's comment, I was about to head to bed so I didn't really provide details LOL

[–] nameisnotimportant 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

fixed it by blocking the element

Which one? That'd certainly help to know how to do that

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

www.youtube.com/##.paper-toast-open.yt-notification-action-renderer.style-scope.toast-button

I believe it was this one, just add it as part of the filter list in ublock

The extension I used for user agent was this one. I don't think it matters what you spoof as, but I chose to spoof as chrome. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-string-switcher/

So far it worked and I'm back to no ads and no interruptions

[–] nameisnotimportant 1 points 2 hours ago

Thanks, I'll have a look at this later and I'm sure it'll prove useful for everyone!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Lemme know if they ever reply.

[–] nameisnotimportant 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes they did! See right above or direct link https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19270078

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have ublock, with sponsor block and some others, and don't have any issues on yt as of yet. Just in case though, how do I block an element and spoof a user agent?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

YouTube does a shit ton of A/B testing so they probably didn't roll that change out to everyone yet. I currently don't have any issues either but they will eventually hit us with that shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago

"Is your video not loading ? Check out why, you fucking ad dodging commie" is the feeling i got from youtube's newest message while my video was unexpectedly taking 10s to load

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

So here's what happened recently:

  • I opened the Google News widget on my Android phone, saw a Sponsored link, and found it interesting
  • Clicked on it, the link opened in Chrome, opening the googleadservices redirection thingummy
  • Took over 5 seconds to process the redirect
  • I exited the browser

Guess who missed ad money?


But of course, maybe they got the ad money and the only losers were:

  • me, who didn't get to see the website that might actually have had something I wanted
  • the website owner, who not only didn't get my business but also had to pay Google, because Google most probably processed the ad first and didn't care to process the redirect

I feel like I understand why they removed the "Do no evil" sign. Because now, they are messing with both, the product and the customers, only providing as much as is required to take their money, instead of the full, advertised service.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

They cannot kill Adblocks, because if they would — a lot of html5 embedded YouTube videos would be coming worthless and so would youtube (discord for example)

[–] [email protected] 67 points 14 hours ago

Make me wait 5 mins on a black screen and I'll do that before watching an ad.

load more comments
view more: next ›