this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
194 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

71502 readers
4085 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

mostly shit already. ymmv

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I recommend Kagi. It is a search engine with absolutely no tracking or ads, AI slop filter, an in-house index and a cute doggo. It's a paid search engine (which means you pay with money not with data), but you can give it a try with 300 free searches with no strings attached.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're soon going to end up back in the early/mid 90s where the only way to find something is via a internet yellowpages.. only this time, not because search engines dont exist yet, but because they are completely worthless garbage.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget to put your website on a webring! https://xn--sr8hvo.ws/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man I miss the old internet..

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone posted this the other day: https://goodinternetmagazine.com/building-a-slow-web/

I really liked the idea so I quickly made my personal site and put it on the indie webring. It's a tiny community but it's there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

its neat, but its not the same. old internet was more than a thing. it was an era.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unpopular opinion: The missing business model for websites is killing the web. If there was a platform that would distribute a monthly fee to the websites we visit, the web would be much better.

50% could be allocated through traffic, 50% by choice. I could pay 20€ a month for example. Some would go to lemmy, some to my local newspaper, some to my favorite YouTube channels, authors or bloggers.

If enough people did this, investigative journalism would be funded, product testers wouldn't be reliant on sponsoring and hobbyists could gain serious funding without selling out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like you want to nationalise the internet and all its services. :P

If only we could pay for a worthwhile internet via taxes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

All it would take would be a platform that handles the payment and supplies a tracking pixel. Websites could join and become part of it. At the moment, every single publisher has their own payment solution. If I want to read one local article from Houston today and one from Tokyo tomorrow, I won't join two payment plans. I want them to be paid automatically, like when I play a song on Spotify or watch a video on YouTube. Just a decent amount of money instead of paying mostly middlemen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

This sounds exactly like what Brave is/was supposed to be/could have been.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love a if there was a standard websites would use to receive donations. An integrated browser addon that track what you visit and gives you a review before distributing funds after each month would be great. It should accumulate money to avoid transaction fees for tiny amounts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC that AI Overviews have been good for the web, and AI Mode will be no different. Google insists these features send users to "a greater diversity of websites" and the traffic is "higher quality" because people spend more time on the links they click.

However, the company hasn't provided data to back up these claims.

This is how we know they are lying.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC “Trust us, bro.”

Non-AI summary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More time per click is such a useless metric for the end user.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I could spend a lot of time sifting through ads, nag screens and bullshit to find the actual detail I want on a webpage.

[–] TriflingToad 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, thats fuckin' metal, bro. Also, the text to gif gave me a flashback of ~15 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

feels like its 1998 and I'm listening to MTV while browsing the web on AOL with that gif, lol

[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago (2 children)

the web is already destroyed with all the spam, commercial crap, tracking and spying

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But the people making money off of all of that are mad now, hence this article.

[–] Sixtyforce 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. smallest violin plays in the distance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

What is dead may never die.

[–] hydrashok 44 points 2 days ago

“About to”?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

I haven't used Google Search in quite a while. It's frankly unusable for finding any useful information for someone like me.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not sure about the web but Google can for sure Yahoo themselves out of existence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I miss Yahoo games.

Google only has one game, and it's not even multiplayer. :/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Yahoo games and clubs, groups and search, chat and messenger that had filesharing and video and allowed cross fertilisation between everything. It was becoming the internet, it was set to buy Google and then it just stopped and closed it all down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Google search engine has been shit for a decade or more. Wasn't there some document that it was made so by purpose, because there was no incentive to improve it becuse there was no real competition or the competition was just a front-end to google.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

I'm not a huge fan of Ed Zitron generally, he leans towards histrionic too much for my tastes, but he makes a compelling case here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

histrionic

True... yet nearly everybody else, maybe beside few like 404 media, seems to be either boot licking or access "journalism" so I get the "spicy" take.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

2018-2019 is when they officially turned the corner and decided to focus only on ad revenue. But the SEO abuse dove it into the ground by 2014ish. They were making money enough to expand by orders of magnitude into other areas, so they simply didn't want to tweak their search or strategy and kill their golden goose that funded things like Good Drive and their shit social network and loon, etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I called this one pretty early on. Let's see if it catches on or tanks the Goog.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Cool, I'll just ditch Google at work as well, then

load more comments
view more: next ›