this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
433 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

China is behind the largest known covert propaganda operation ever identified on Facebook and Instagram, according to a new report by security researchers at Meta.

Meta on Tuesday outed the authors of a four-year long influence campaign dubbed “Spamouflage Dragon,” which first appeared in 2019 to spread propaganda about Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests. Since then, the campaign has focused on spreading disinformation about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, attacking dissidents and critics abroad, criticizing the United States, and attempting to sow division during the 2022 midterm elections.

For years, researchers have speculated that the voluminous Spamouflage Dragon posts were connected to the Chinese government but have been unable to publicly prove a link until now. The link comes courtesy of overlapping content found in both Meta’s report and charges filed against Chinese intelligence operatives back in spring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'll assume there is a long list of influential Americans that got paid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

maybe a short list of people running social media platforms, getting paid under the table

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hope you aren't implying that the company that released this report linking spam to the Chinese government is actually taking bribes from the Chinese government, because that would just be silly lol.

If you mean other platforms like Reddit and Twitter... maybe, but I still think it's unlikely. I'm sure it's a lot cheaper to let accounts be blocked and create new spam accounts than to actually pay off platforms to let those spam accounts exist, especially because moderation on social media platforms has always been a very difficult thing to get right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i'll bet a suitcase full of Chinese cash could find someone to help them, wherever they needed it, in any of those operations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uh, sure, maybe, but my point is why give away suitcases full of cash when you don't need to

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 months ago (28 children)

So apparently they really suck at it? That's kind of hilarious

The trolls have demonstrated a weak command of idiomatic English with articles that, while prolific, often misspell key names or use English and Mandarin interchangeably. Other posts — like a critique of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 trip to Taiwan — appear long after the events they purported to preview.

At other times, the spammers attempted to push niche and esoteric Chinese propaganda talking points onto unreceptive audiences by piggybacking on clickable search engine optimized headlines. In one case cited by Meta researchers, Spamouflage Dragon trolls filled the replies of social media forum questions like “How do I lose belly fat through weight lifting?” with propaganda articles about “Chinese Police Strengthening International Law Enforcement Cooperation.”

They don't mention what the propagandists push about COVID. The usual line from weirdo propagandists is that COVID is a secret bioweapon and was released from the Wuhan labs intentionally. I assume China wouldn't sign on to that one? Do they just push the scientific consensus, which is that the origin is unknown but is probably natural, and possibly an unintentional lab leak? Or an exaggeration thereof which completely discounts the lab leak theory but still asserts what is most probable -- it's from animals? That's pretty weak sauce for propaganda. Maybe they push some nuance about COVID that only the Chinese government cares about. Or maybe they go buck wild and say it was developed by NATO biolabs in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago

So in the report by Meta, they go into a little more detail. One post in particular claimed that Fort Detrick is the origin of Covid. Fort Detrick is located in Maryland, and a quick google shows that it hasn't worked on biological weapons since the late 60s.

Here's Meta's full report: https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.8562-6/10000000_180063885098584_6098733693167598956_n.pdf?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=ae5e01&_nc_ohc=xfoti16XMyMAX_H1sjP&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=00_AfBw-FF6-NEqznOXr7ZYyGNvrEZbb-9FFm6Bw6K8eZJ_pg&oe=64F1F5AE

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

So basically they tried to do what Russia did but worse

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Everyone interferes with our election cause we've let our citizens become dumb as fucking rocks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We didn't just let it happen, we made it happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I don't know why the expectation exists that they should want to build an audience. You don't need to build an audience to cause chaos. You just need the chaos message to generate enough noise to confuse people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or this is just the smoke screen actions and there are much more extensive actions that might actually be working on the rest of the platforms.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] relative_iterator 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What ever happened to those Hong Kong protests? I’m assuming they finally got shut down thanks to covid?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unfortunately they failed to stop the CCP’s National Security Law and the electoral reform which now ensures only “patriots” can run for office (see wiki synopsis). Hong Kong, in a political sense, is now only nominally separate from China. Such a heart-breaking loss.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

The CCP continued to escalate their response until continuing the protest was unfeasible.

This legislation is generally seen as the final nail in the coffin: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_national_security_law

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention all the Fentanyl precursors China has been pumping into other countries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Reverse opium wars

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Meta on Tuesday outed the authors of a four-year long influence campaign dubbed “Spamouflage Dragon,” which first appeared in 2019 to spread propaganda about Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests.

Federal prosecutors accused dozens of Chinese Ministry of Public Security officials of being behind a covert social media propaganda campaign in a criminal complaint filed in April.

In one video posted by the trolls, narrators urged viewers “not to vote for someone” and showed footage of January 6 rioters while claiming that “The solution is to root out this ineffective and incapacitated system.”

At other times, the spammers attempted to push niche and esoteric Chinese propaganda talking points onto unreceptive audiences by piggybacking on clickable search engine optimized headlines.

In one case cited by Meta researchers, Spamouflage Dragon trolls filled the replies of social media forum questions like “How do I lose belly fat through weight lifting?” with propaganda articles about “Chinese Police Strengthening International Law Enforcement Cooperation.”

The campaign’s lack of any audience development despite years of operation, dozens of personnel behind it, and thousands of pieces of content leads some to wonder why China even bothers with the trolling effort.


The original article contains 740 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Next time buy AMD...

I'll shut the door on my way out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I wanted to make AMD joke

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Since the article didn't link the report, I have it attached here: https://transparency.fb.com/integrity-reports-q2-2023/

As we always should do with these reports, let's question the source:

  1. The lead author is Ben Nimmo, a senior fellow for Atlantic Council. According to testimony, "the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and [others] all have inadequately-disclosed ties to the Department of Defense, the C.I.A., and other intelligence agencies. They work with multiple U.S. government agencies to institutionalize censorship research and advocacy within dozens of other universities and think tanks." According to this internal CIA memo (accessible via FOIA), Atlantic Council fellows are almost all controlled by various US intelligence agencies and report to the director of the CIA.

  2. Ben Nimmo's track record of identifying state-sponsored misinformation is spotty at best. A few years ago, the DFR wrote a hit piece that implicated Ian Shilling (a British retiree) as a Russian bot disinformation account. This led to the takedown of his account by Twitter... Which was rolled back soon after after he went to the news... He was then suspended under X, so go him I guess.

  3. Looking at the authors, we have Ben Nimmo (discussed above), Mike Torrey (previous NSA and CIA analyst), Margarita Franklin (has conspicuous 3 year gap between her masters graduation and her first job, quickly rising to the role of Director... which could be a coincidence), David Agranovich (ex-DOD, ex-National Security Council), and Margie Milam/Lindsay Hundley/Robert Claim (for all intents and purposes legitimate people focusing on IP and DNS). Given the large number of actual, non-government-affiliated cybersecurity researchers, the prevalence of ex-US intelligence on this report is rather startling.

Overall, there's a stronger claim for this report being US propaganda (as shown above) than there is for some barely-intelligible sentences that look like they were written literally by idiots being Chinese propaganda... But who knows, maybe they're both propaganda?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Overall, there’s a stronger claim for this being US propaganda

Why would the US want to cast doubt on their own voting system? Chinese interference or otherwise

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

They believed the Gov. was about to expose their collusion in it, is my bet. An attempt to get ahead of the issue unlike in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

They're not guilty for the things their users do. Bad actors are all over Facebook, so revealing a government was using their platform for nefarious purposes is more like, "See? We can be good guys, too!" It's positive PR to be proactive like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's no guilt implied for Facebook when bad actors use the service in coordinated ways.

If my uncle can post crazy shit to Facebook, so can seemingly-random groups of people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

If you take them at their word, they didn't realize the efforts were connected to the CCP. Which, since CCP is somewhat competent at online harassment, is believable.

[–] poke 2 points 11 months ago

There was so much of this around the "weather balloons" as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

You'd think they would at least cite the report from Meta... RollingStone is back at it with their top tier journalism.

load more comments
view more: next ›